We performed a comparison between Digital.ai Application Security and SonarQube based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security."
"The depth features I have found most valuable. You receive a quick comprehensive comparison overview regarding the current release and the last release and what type of depths dependency or duplication should be used. This is going to help you to make a more readable code and have more flexibility for the engineers to understand how things should work when they do not know."
"Apart from the security point of view, I like that it makes it easy to detect code smells and other issues in terms of code quality and standards."
"The most valuable feature of SonarQube I have found to be the configuration that has allowed us to can make adjusts to the demands of the code review. It gives a specified classification regarding the skill, prioritization, and it is easy for me to review and make my code."
"Using SonarQube benefits us because we are able to avoid the inclusion of malware in our applications."
"We have the software metrics that SonarQube gives us, which is something we did not have before. This helps us work towards aiming coding standards to empower us to move in the direction of better code quality. SonarQube provides targets and metrics for that."
"We have worked with the support from SonarQube and we have had good experiences."
"It assists during the development with SonarLint and helps the developer to change his approach or rather improve his coding pattern or style. That's one advantage I've seen. Another advantage is that we can customize the rules."
"SonarQube is designed well making it easy to use, simple to identify issues and find solutions to problems."
"I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities."
"There isn't a very good enterprise report."
"During the setup process, we only had one issue related to the number of available files. To perform the analysis, you have quite a lot of available file handles, so we had to increase that limit."
"It should be user-friendly."
"The time it took for me to do the whole process was approximately two hours because I had to download, read the documentation, and do the configurations."
"We're in the process of figuring out how to automate the workflow for QA audit controls on it. I think that's perhaps an area that we could use some buffing. We're a Kubernetes shop, so there are some things that aren't direct fits, which we're struggling with on the component Docker side. But nothing major."
"The security in SonarQube could be better."
"It does not provide deeper scanning of vulnerabilities in an application, on a live session. This is something we are not happy about. Maybe the reason for that is we are running the community edition currently, but other editions may improve on that aspect."
"I would like to see SonarQube implement a good amount of improvements to the product's security features. Another aspect of SonarQube that could be improved is the search functionality."
Digital.ai Application Security is ranked 36th in Application Security Tools with 1 review while SonarQube is ranked 1st in Application Security Tools with 110 reviews. Digital.ai Application Security is rated 6.0, while SonarQube is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Digital.ai Application Security writes "Helps to improve knowledge on software security ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonarQube writes "Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages". Digital.ai Application Security is most compared with PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Fortify Application Defender, whereas SonarQube is most compared with Checkmarx One, SonarCloud, Coverity, Veracode and Snyk.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
