We performed a comparison between Digital.ai Continuous Testing and Katalon Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."
"Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing. They also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."
"The functionality of the data is very good. You can upload and disperse data using the solution."
"It supports multiple easy-to-learn languages."
"The most valuable feature of Katalon Studio is the ease of use of the solution."
"It is good for API testing. It is also good for continuous integration testing. You can connect it to Jenkins."
"The most valuable features of Katalon Studio are its user-friendliness and the AI smart healing capabilities."
"The initial setup of Katalon Studio was easy."
"The best thing about the solution is that there is a record and playback functionality."
"One of the features that I like is Object Recognition. It worked very well, and it allowed me to create a dynamic expert based on my requirements."
"I would also like to see more videos and descriptions that could make installation more efficient."
"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."
"I can say that in my company, we struggle a lot with iOS automation."
"The price of Katalon Studio is an area of concern where improvement is required."
"The integration process with Jira should be enhanced and facilitated."
"I've seen that our clients are not truly aware of the power behind Katalon."
"We have been seeing some error pop-ups that are difficult to understand why they were triggered."
"One aspect that can be improved is testing for desktop applications. I would like to see them support more technologies in this area."
"The price of the solution is a bit high. It's one of the reasons we decided not to continue using the product."
"Katalon doesn't support testing of hybrid applications. It's a limitation."
More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Digital.ai Continuous Testing is ranked 28th in Test Automation Tools while Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Test Automation Tools with 42 reviews. Digital.ai Continuous Testing is rated 6.6, while Katalon Studio is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Digital.ai Continuous Testing writes "Useful for running tests on many different types of real devices but requires some end-to-end video examples to get started quickly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes "Useful multiple technology platform, scalable, but usability could improve". Digital.ai Continuous Testing is most compared with Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca and Sauce Labs, whereas Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Testim and Appium. See our Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Katalon Studio report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.