We performed a comparison between Digital.ai Continuous Testing and LambdaTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."
"Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing. They also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."
"This product offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
"The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us."
"LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
"LambdaTest easily integrates with leading project management, bug tracking, and CI-CD tools like Jira, Asana, Jenkins, Circle CI, and more."
"It's user-friendly and offers valuable features for testing, making it a reliable tool."
"Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!"
"In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues."
"The UI is pretty clean and easy to navigate, and we were able to figure it out very quickly."
"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."
"I would also like to see more videos and descriptions that could make installation more efficient."
"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."
"LambdaTest needs to have native application testing, which would be a great help to my team."
"It would be much easier for us to read the test if they provided dashboard analytics."
"The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."
"Sometimes, when multiple users use the tool simultaneously, it can slow down, affecting efficiency."
"Load flow compared to other stacks needs improvement."
"Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis...There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time."
"It would be nice to have an API for visual regression testing."
More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Digital.ai Continuous Testing is ranked 28th in Test Automation Tools while LambdaTest is ranked 14th in Test Automation Tools with 21 reviews. Digital.ai Continuous Testing is rated 6.6, while LambdaTest is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Digital.ai Continuous Testing writes "Useful for running tests on many different types of real devices but requires some end-to-end video examples to get started quickly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Technical support should be improved, though it has great documentation". Digital.ai Continuous Testing is most compared with Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca and Sauce Labs, whereas LambdaTest is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and Perfecto. See our Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. LambdaTest report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.