We performed a comparison between Edgeverve AssistEdge Cloud RPA and Microsoft Power Automate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Microsoft, Automation Anywhere and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)."I would say that the cross-integration between different modules, such as between the OCR, RPA, and ML, is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features are that it is low-code and simple."
"The best part is the automated workflow, which is quite good and easy. It is just drag-and-drop. We are able to create workflows quite quickly. We are able to directly integrate the data that it generates with Power BI dashboards. Its integration is quite good with other Microsoft tools, such as Power BI. The visualization of the data has become helpful for us."
"I like that Power Automate gives us a connector to be able to connect different data sources or different software."
"Power Automate is intuitive and easy to use."
"The initial setup isn't too difficult."
"The feature most useful for integrating different applications is its ability to create flows. Specifically, we use flows to integrate with finance and operations."
"Its complete integration with Microsoft tools and the inclusion of the CRM are the most valuable features. It is embedded directly in the Office package, so clients have direct access to it. It has a lot more functionality than other standalone solutions, such as UiPath or Blue Prism."
"Instead of manually triggering payments through the website, everything was done through robotic process automation (RPA), saving us a lot of time."
"Better training and better accessibility of the tools are the things that need to be improved."
"They can provide a deeper level of feedback about running processes. When I compare it to Blue Prism, the control room has slightly less information about the running processes and possible errors. I'm not a pro, so I am not entirely sure if this is a core feature of the product or if it is because of the way our partners have developed it or set it up."
"I need to have more integration capabilities from this solution."
"The licensing model is difficult to understand and is something that should be improved."
"Sometimes there are issues with security policies within the company. Some parts get blacked. There are some drawbacks when we use it connected to the cloud. We need to convince clients to open some parts. This is often an issue that originates from the company itself, not Power Automate."
"It is mostly integrated with the Microsoft environment. Unlike UiPath, we cannot really use external tools with Microsoft Power Automate. There should be a possibility to integrate it with external tools or systems."
"The OCR functionality needs to be improved."
"They should include a custom plugin feature so that we can add our custom connections."
"This solution should be more resilient, with robots more capable of recovering after an error."
Earn 20 points
Edgeverve AssistEdge Cloud RPA is ranked 43rd in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) while Microsoft Power Automate is ranked 2nd in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 123 reviews. Edgeverve AssistEdge Cloud RPA is rated 6.0, while Microsoft Power Automate is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Edgeverve AssistEdge Cloud RPA writes "Stable with good cross-integration between modules, but the training needs to be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Automate writes "Provides valuable integration with other Microsoft tools". Edgeverve AssistEdge Cloud RPA is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Power Automate is most compared with UiPath, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA), IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and Tungsten RPA.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
