We performed a comparison between ESET EDR/XDR and Microsoft Entra ID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems."The solution is easy to use."
"The security features, multi-factor authentication, and service management features are valuable."
"I primarily use this solution for hybrid deployment, security, securing resources and for integration purposes. In terms of security, we have been using the B2B/B2C hybrid integration with the certificate authentication."
"Azure is the leading market solution because of its history, features, and maturity."
"The solution scales well."
"Configuring the domain and setting it up in the Azure portal is just three clicks to be honest."
"The valuable features I use daily are enterprise application, conditional access, identity governance, password monitoring, and a password reset."
"Being able to easily authenticate yourself on the MSA app is valuable. It is easy to use. Rather than receiving a code in an SMS, you can just verify that it is you. You don't have to punch in any password or any six-digit code. That's the feature that I like the most."
"The single sign-on is very convenient for us."
"The solution could improve how it scours each website."
"I haven't had any issues with the product."
"The solution can improve the educational portion because it is an administration cost."
"I would like to see Microsoft communicate how they intend to manage legacy applications. Right now, you still have to deploy a hosted domain server (which comes at an extra cost) if you have a legacy application that cannot sync properly with the enterprise applications and the modern applications."
"The product needs to be more user-friendly."
"We previously used Microsoft's technical support, which was excellent; they were very responsive. Now, we use a CSP, and their support is lacking, so I rate them five out of ten."
"We have a custom solution now running to tie all those Azure ADs together. We use the B2B functionality for that. Improvements are already on the roadmap for Azure AD in that area. I think they will make it easier to work together between two different tenants in Azure AD, because normally one tenant is a security boundary. For example, company one has a tenant and company two has a tenant, and then you can do B2B collaboration between those, but it is still quite limited. For our use case, it is enough currently. However, if we want to extend the collaboration even further, then we need an easier way to collaborate between two tenants, but I think that is already on the roadmap of Azure AD anyway."
"Microsoft should work on enhancing its machine-learning algorithm to prevent unnecessary lockouts of users."
"I had some issues with the Azure Active Directory on Windows XP. However, it worked well on Windows 7."
ESET EDR/XDR is ranked 36th in Authentication Systems with 1 review while Microsoft Entra ID is ranked 1st in Authentication Systems with 190 reviews. ESET EDR/XDR is rated 0.0, while Microsoft Entra ID is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ESET EDR/XDR writes "An easy-to-use solution that could improve it’s website-scouring capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID writes "Saves us time and money and features Conditional Access policies, SSPR, and MFA". ESET EDR/XDR is most compared with Wazuh, Microsoft Defender XDR, Bitdefender GravityZone EDR and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response, whereas Microsoft Entra ID is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Google Cloud Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Ping Identity Platform and Okta Workforce Identity.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.