We performed a comparison between Everest Blueriq and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"There are a lot of things that you get out-of-the-box: Timers and so on, which took a lot of effort and code before."
"We are receiving good assistance from the technical support."
"We use the solution to develop and deliver products."
"I think the best way it can be it improved, is to make it easier to install. It's a very complicated piece of software, and there are a lot of things you have to do to get it set up. It's not just running an installer. You install WebSphere. You install the BPM product, and there's a large host of other steps you have to do: run queries against the database, you have to manually configure a bunch of properties files for your environment. I think if they could streamline all that, so it wasn't a considerable effort to install, that would be very useful. Because from an engineering point of view, you want to spend as little time as possible actually installing a product."
"We are implementing the tool to triple our monthly transaction volume."
"It provides a very robust environment to build an integration framework or workflow patterns that we have. A lot of changes or modifications have been made to this solution over the past few years. The features that they have added this time have helped developers like us to work on the developmental environment and leverage all the capabilities of the tool. This is what I like about this solution."
"It makes the company business processes work more efficiently."
"It is being able to see the process, and understanding what the process is versus having to bury it in code somewhere."
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
"We need process monitoring. It is somewhat complex to monitor all the processes which work."
"It needs more customization. We like to customize the screens to show more things related to our company."
"Process Server is no more available than new products out there, but in general IBM has a high cost and complex setup."
"I would like to see the solution be able to interact with other customer software solutions."
"The initial setup process is complex for basic users."
"Integration with web services, especially in the standard version of the product."
"I'm hearing things might be improving, to really deliver on BPM as opposed to simply workflow. That really should be emphasized a lot more than it has been, because a lot of customers will simply implement the process and leave it there, because the product maybe doesn't emphasize BPM as much as it should, as much as maybe they talk about it in the sales process. The whole idea of BPM, is to iteratively improve the process, and in order to do that you have to have the analytics tool with it. A lot of times that doesn't go as far as it should simply because there's a lot more work to be done for that to happen, and just some sort of technical limitations that don't make that as easy as it should be."
"It is not user-friendly."
Everest Blueriq is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews. Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM, whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.