We performed a comparison between FatPipe SD-WAN and VMware SD-WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions."The most valuable feature of FatPipe SD-WAN is it's based on SD-WAN technology."
"The service they provide is very stable and is the main influencer of why customers purchase this solution."
"They have a lot of built-ins. There are so many applications defined inside the solution. It makes it so that we don't have to create some policies. Each and every application is already defined in it."
"I would absolutely recommend VeloCloud because it's user-friendly and because the integration is easier than with other solutions."
"The biggest feature is called D.M.P.O., or Dynamic Multipath Optimization, which is one of the technologies that they use to deliver or ensure data integrity."
"The most valuable feature of VMware SD-WAN is flexibility. It is more flexible than other vendors."
"When extra capacity is needed, we can get it very quickly."
"SD-WAN is cloud-based and you can manage multiple sites within one single pane of glass."
"The most valuable feature is the Dynamic Multipath Optimization (DMPO), which allows the customer to maintain and monitor their link quality in real-time."
"FatPipe SD-WAN can improve the price to scale the solution."
"There is still room for improvement in support and security, especially in enhancing the SASE aspect of the platform."
"Its integration with the security systems would be a nice implementation. They can also consider using a management platform for both network and security operations. This would be a great improvement."
"It needs better security."
"The product should have on-demand tunnels instead of fixed tunnels."
"The solution needs improvement on security features and should include two firewalls. Cloud VPN can’t support any link. The solution needs to also improve the availability of centralized internal management. It needs to have debug detection and Deep Packet Detection features as well. The documentation for VMware is also hard to find."
"VMware SD-WAN can improve on the security features."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing."
"There are a number of customers we have that require a fully mashed SD-WAN on VeloCloud that is not available currently."
FatPipe SD-WAN is ranked 16th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 1 review while VMware SD-WAN is ranked 4th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 50 reviews. FatPipe SD-WAN is rated 8.0, while VMware SD-WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of FatPipe SD-WAN writes "Beneficial technology, reliable, and simple deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware SD-WAN writes "To fully utilize cloud vendors' hardware networking, Microsoft and VMware support everything". FatPipe SD-WAN is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate and Cisco SD-WAN, whereas VMware SD-WAN is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, Fortinet FortiGate, Meraki SD-WAN, Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Netskope .
See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.