We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The incident management and fingerprinting have been the most valuable features."
"After the configuration, it is very stable, and in the last two years, I haven't been faced with many issues or product-related challenges."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it captures where the data is being moved."
"We don't require a lot of downtime, but when we do then we are getting proper support with no issue."
"Our organization's intellectual property is not misused or extracted without permission."
"The most valuable feature of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is the OCR."
"The ease of configuration was probably one of its biggest selling points."
"The technical support for the solution is very good."
"The general endpoint protection is valuable, and it is easy to manage."
"The most valuable features of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator are the easy-to-use console, and lots of reports, such as customized reports and inventory reports. Additionally, overall the centralized management is very good where you can see the compliance levels and inventory."
"The valuable feature of the McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is the management of the policies."
"McAfee is helping us to clean all of the viruses from the machines, protecting our desktops from the latest threats."
"I like the solution's feasibility. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is also better and easier to use than other ePOs."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the central management console, which is used for DLP, endpoint security, drive encryption, and application control."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has a built-in advanced pattern, which is very useful because it can detect any pattern."
"Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention can improve by having an uninstall option for the client or restart of a client agent can be controlled from the server. This feature is missing which is available with other solutions."
"The tool needs to integrate data classification."
"The ease of deployment wasn't as flexible as Digital Guardian."
"The support could improve Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention."
"They can improve a bit in the OCR category. The OCR deployment could be simplified. Right now, you have to set up a separate server to manage all the data going through the network, especially the images. Forcepoint could better integrate the OCR component with central management."
"I would like to see the product extended into the cloud as a single solution."
"Usually for the biome of a small company, like 50 users, setup takes more than one week."
"Everything takes a long time, as it does in every software company, especially since COVID. That is something I notice with every product I use."
"The way that ePolicy launches the updates is very slow. It would be great if that was faster."
"McAfee should improve in terms of customer support and assigning a knowledgeable TAM to customers."
"We need to consolidate multiple features into one console. It would be beneficial to have all the important features on a single platform."
"The solution sometimes has some false positives on IP addresses, from the web control aspect of the product. This needs to be improved."
"There should be more insights and completeness into the cyber kill chain, similar to CrowdStrike and SentinelOne. It just seems a little outdated in being 100% signature-based without all of the insights and protections that come with CrowdStrike and SentinelOne. Overall, they've got some catching up to do if they plan to compete in the comprehensive EDR space."
"The impact of the agent on the endpoint's performance - the resources it takes. Additionally, the difficulties we experience with inheriting and breaking inheritance on the organization's structure breakdown for policy inheritance and then for rules inheritance. We are actually struggling with this."
"The solution is difficult to tune to avoid false positives."
"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator should improve its integration with other tools."
More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 2nd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 52 reviews while McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is ranked 9th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 39 reviews. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "DLP great for encryptions; tech support is quite helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator writes "Useful agent communication, reliable, but lacking support for microservices". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Zscaler DLP, whereas McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is most compared with Splunk SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Zscaler DLP. See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator report.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
