We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We appreciate the user-friendliness and ease of implementation of the Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention platform. The availability of the vendor support team is an added advantage."
"It has helped us meet CTI requirements. Some employees accidentally shared information and it was able to block that information. That is one of the biggest benefits we have seen from this tool."
"The product is good and reliable. The vendor company is continually improving it and they seem to stay one step ahead."
"It was mostly stable."
"The most useful features of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention are the transfer through Bluetooth can be blocked and the transfer to the cloud-based storage can be blocked. The features are wonderful."
"I did not experience any crashes. The solution has been stable in my usage."
"The fingerprinting technology is the solution's most valuable feature. It's unique to Forcepoint."
"I like that you can quickly create policies and enforce them in a matter of minutes."
"Another important feature is that the solution doesn't require any additional infrastructure to implement. It's a software license that is compatible with our existing hardware. We were able to install and configure the product seamlessly and effortlessly."
"Our clients primarily deploy Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP to control the flow of information in and out of their networks. The main use cases include monitoring and managing sensitive data such as credit card information and personally identifiable information."
"The setup is very easy as we just need to switch on and switch off."
"It is a stable solution with good support."
More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Pros →
"When you automatically try to upgrade the agent it causes problems."
"The protection of personal data needs to be improved."
"The post-optical character recognization feature could be improved because it only really works on documents with some length (at least three paragraphs)."
"There is no support for the Bangla (Bengali) language, so we cannot use the Forcepoint technology for Bangla documents."
"I am really impressed by the interface and management console but the requirements are very high and the response time is too slow."
"An area for improvement for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is its price. It would be good if they could offer better pricing."
"The setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"An area for improvement in Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is the complex UI and policy deployment. You have to find the policies, and then designing the policies is also tricky."
"The solution needs improvement in stability. There has been feedback regarding the accuracy of file categorization."
"There is room for improvement in the documentation around the maintenance of the product, how the automatic updates work, and pushing out new policies. A little more detail and context in that area would be helpful."
"You need to have an external solution to backup everything. For example, you need to have Syslog installed on your server as well so that you can back it up to another place."
"Its scalability is not on par with the features of others."
More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Cons →
More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 2nd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 52 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is ranked 14th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 4 reviews. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "DLP great for encryptions; tech support is quite helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention writes "A solution having automation as one of its strongest points". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and GTB Technologies Inspector, whereas Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Cyberhaven. See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.