We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway and Quad9 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Internet Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I have found the web content filtering and malware filter the most valuable."
"The GUI is quite nice."
"The most valuable feature is the categorization, where you can allow general access to an application but limit specific features."
"SWG allows me to track internet usage patterns, helping optimize bandwidth and understand how much time each employee spends online."
"The solution’s administration is easy."
"I have found the simplicity of the solution valuable. The dashboard and reports are good as well."
"For the most part, the solution, when set up correctly, works fine."
"The policies are category-based, so knowledge of another content URL is not compulsory."
"The most valuable feature of Quad9 is that it is a free solution."
"Setting up Quad9 is straightforward if you know what you're doing, and it's easy to use overall."
"I have been in contact with technical support several times, and I am not happy with them."
"The reporting must be improved."
"The product could be improved by including a consolidated product that can carry on Forcepoint product email, web, and DLP."
"To access the root of the product for troubleshooting you must have a data engineer. This is the big issue with Forcepoint. The support community is not good."
"Managing the endpoint for both DLP and web security should be simplified."
"The reporting could be improved."
"The automation lifecycle, integration, and export functionality could all be improved."
"The initial setup was complex."
"It used to work fine for all the devices, but it started to slow and become non-responsive. I would have to reload the page two or three times before all the pages loaded. With OpenDNS, I only need to load the page once."
"Quad9 could improve by having more free features, such as custom DNS filtering."
More Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is ranked 3rd in Internet Security with 47 reviews while Quad9 is ranked 11th in Internet Security with 2 reviews. Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is rated 7.8, while Quad9 is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway writes "Simple to set up, reliable, and offers great reporting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quad9 writes "It's easy to use and set up, but I've faced performance problems ". Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Cisco Umbrella, Symantec Proxy, Fortinet FortiProxy and Fortinet FortiGate SWG, whereas Quad9 is most compared with Cloudflare DNS, Google Cloud DNS, Cisco Umbrella, Verisign Public DNS and Neustar UltraDNS. See our Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs. Quad9 report.
See our list of best Internet Security vendors.
We monitor all Internet Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.