We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiWeb and NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."SSL Offloading simplifies the public certificate handling and brings additional protection features."
"FortiWeb's ease of deployment is what we liked the most about it. Implementing FortiWeb was extremely fast and easy, which was a significant advantage. It comes with several preconfigured rule sets and templates."
"The GUI is user-friendly and it's easy to understand how to manage it."
"The support services, performance, and pricing are all valuable features. The performance is excellent."
"It is a good product. We have just blocked everything coming from some geographical locations or certain countries, and it has been working very efficiently when I look at logs, events, and incidents generated from the system. It is generating very good analytic reports about it. This is the most valuable thing about this solution. It has load balancing and almost everything that a web application firewall needs. It is very flexible and easy to learn and configure. It can be easily learned and configured by using the information available on different channels such as YouTube."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiWeb is the ease of integration and configuration."
"Fortinet is a great SD-WAN player when it comes to security capabilities."
"Fortinet FortiWeb is priced well."
"Since we are using this tool for protection purposes we really appreciate the hybrid security abilities; the main idea here is that we powerful protection our application needs."
"They could improve their support a little bit for faster response time."
"The F5 solution has more features than Fortinet FortiWeb, such as multiple load balancing."
"FortiWeb needs to have support for the newest technology being used in web applications."
"We would like to know more about the integration with the hardware or security products, such as Gemalto, because we need to move to that point."
"I would like to see more improvements with respect to threat intelligence."
"It may be better if it were easier to create roles."
"Fortinet FortiWeb is not scalable. You'll need more budget to change the hardware."
"We want to see more detailed logging, such as audit logging, as this would significantly enhance the solution's reporting. We currently get some information from logs, but more would be better."
"There is a need for expanded licensing terms and options. There's also a need for improved and more agile customization features. The user needs to be able to manage each policy as required; the functionality needs to empower the user. There should be a complete suite of desktop provider policies available to users. Overall, it needs to be more user-friendly."
Earn 20 points
Fortinet FortiWeb is ranked 4th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 83 reviews while NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall is ranked 43rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Fortinet FortiWeb is rated 8.0, while NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiWeb writes "Cost-effective, easy to configure, and works very well as a single solution for multiple environments". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall writes "Offers Application Protection Against Web Attacks". Fortinet FortiWeb is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, Fortinet FortiADC, AWS WAF, Azure Web Application Firewall and Imperva Web Application Firewall, whereas NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall is most compared with .
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.