We performed a comparison between Fortra Tripwire IP360 and Qualys Web Application Scanning based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management."It's become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network or anything that's passing through to production to first be affected by IP360, hardened, and up to standard. For our integrity management, one was deployed in the bank about two years ago and that's still going to expand the usage and the product itself. That will go hand in hand with training and expanding the product as for where it's deployed."
"We could manage our entire IP range with the solution."
"Tripwire IP360 is a very stable solution."
"I have found the detection of vulnerabilities tool thorough with good results and the graphical display output to be wonderful and full of colors. It allows many types of outputs, such as bar and chart previews."
"Qualys Web Application Scanning has multiple features like threat protection and container security scanning in one box."
"The product prevents possible vulnerabilities in our network."
"It is a very stable solution."
"We can do scanning and submit reports straight to the customers when there are new vulnerabilities, then tell them whether they are affected or not."
"The interface is user-friendly and easy to understand."
"With our vulnerabilities under control, it's putting our services in compliance and minimizing our risk for exposure."
"Licensing is the most valuable. Qualys provides the best licensing for companies. It is the best product for the development purposes of web applications. The product has a lot of integrations."
"We need to dedicate time and resources to keep it running."
"The reporting functions can use improvement. There is room for growth because reporting functions differ a lot depending on what you're going to output. It depends on whether it's for technical or senior management and how it's interpreted. There could be growth within the reporting functionality side."
"I am not very impressed by the technical support."
"The support could be faster."
"Qualys Web Application Scanning is very complex to use, and its graphical interface is not very user-friendly."
"The UI is not user-friendly and you don't have a yearly reporting facility where you can slice and dice in different jobs."
"When comparing this solution to Veracode, Veracode has good interactive features and gives a clear understanding of what the vulnerabilities are, which error line of the vulnerability is on and what can be done. It gives interactive features, whereas this solution does not give a clear understanding of where or how to fix the problem."
"The product should allow users to upload their payloads."
"They should try to include business logic vulnerabilities in the scanner testing."
"The solution needs to adjust its pricing. They should make it more affordable."
"The pricing does not seem to be competitive."
More Qualys Web Application Scanning Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortra Tripwire IP360 is ranked 40th in Vulnerability Management with 6 reviews while Qualys Web Application Scanning is ranked 19th in Application Security Tools with 31 reviews. Fortra Tripwire IP360 is rated 7.0, while Qualys Web Application Scanning is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Fortra Tripwire IP360 writes "The solution helps users to manage their entire IP range, but it's unreliable and very expensive to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys Web Application Scanning writes "A stable solution that can be used for infrastructure vulnerability scanning and web application scanning". Fortra Tripwire IP360 is most compared with Tenable Nessus, whereas Qualys Web Application Scanning is most compared with OWASP Zap, Veracode, SonarQube, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Fortify WebInspect.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
