We performed a comparison between GitLab and Incredibuild based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation."We're only using the basic features of GitLab and haven't used any advanced features. The solution works fine, so that's what we like about GitLab. We're party using GitHub and GitLab. We have a GitHub server, while we use GitLab locally or only within our team, and it works okay. We don't have any significant problems with the solution. We also found the straightforward setup, stability, and scalability of GitLab valuable."
"The important feature is the entire process of versioning source code maintenance and easy deployment. It is a necessity for the CI/CD pipeline."
"GitLab's best features are continuous integration and fast deployment."
"It is very flexible and easy because you can store data on cloud."
"GitLab is kind of an image of GitHub, so it gives us the flexibility to monitor our changes in the repos."
"The most valuable features of Gitlab are integration with CIE and the ability to rapidly deploy solutions, projects, and applications. It is very easy to use, and there are no complaints."
"The SaaS setup is impressive, and it has DAST solutioning."
"The most valuable feature of GitLab is its convenience. I am able to trace back most of my changes up to a far distance in time and it helps me to analyze and see the older version of the code."
"It is saving time for developers, which is saving money for the company."
"Expand features to match other tools such as a static code analysis tool so third-party integrations are not required."
"The solution does not have many built-in functions or variables so scripting is required."
"I would like configuration of a YML file to be done via UI rather than a code file."
"Reporting could be improved."
"Based on what I know so far, its integration with Kubernetes is not so good. We have to develop many things to make it work. We have to acquire third-party components to work with Kubernetes."
"The solution should be more cloud-native and have more cloud-native capabilities and features."
"I rate the support from GitLab a four out of five."
"As a partner, sometimes it's difficult to get support. They have a really complicated procedure for their support."
"Stability could be improved. I don't know the reason for the instability because there are no logs that help me to understand the problem."
Earn 20 points
GitLab is ranked 1st in Build Automation with 70 reviews while Incredibuild is ranked 20th in Build Automation. GitLab is rated 8.6, while Incredibuild is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Incredibuild writes "Saves time for developers, which saves money for the company". GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, SonarQube, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline and Tekton, whereas Incredibuild is most compared with Bazel and TeamCity.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
