GitLab vs Sonatype Repository Firewall comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitLab Logo
4,611 views|3,608 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Sonatype Logo
793 views|391 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 20, 2023

We performed a comparison between GitLab and Sonatype Nexus Firewall based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: GitLab’s setup is straightforward and easy, with a learning curve for DevOps toolchain implementation. It takes time to set upSonatype Nexus Firewall and Linux knowledge, but upgrades and support are easy.
  • Features: GitLab features a comprehensive CI/CD pipeline, along with a single platform for source code management, build management, test management, artifact management, and deployment management. Sonatype Nexus Firewall offers secure code downloading, vulnerability notifications, and policy enforcement throughout the software development lifecycle.
  • Pricing: GitLab ranges from $19 per user, per month for Premium to $99 per user, per month for Ultimate. Sonatype Nexus Firewall's pricing is reasonable and fair, with no additional costs.
  • Service and Support: GitLab's support is responsive and helpful. Sonatype Nexus Firewall lacks a phone support option.
  • ROI: Both GitLab and Sonatype Nexus Firewall provide a good ROI by improving code quality and security.

Comparison Result: Based on the parameters we compared, Sonatype Nexus Firewall came out ahead of GitLab. Although both products have valuable features and can be estimated as high-end solutions, our reviewers found that GitLab's complexity is its main drawback, which some users find overwhelming and difficult to navigate.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. Sonatype Repository Firewall Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution's service delivery model is fantastic.""I have found the most valuable features of GitLab are the GitClone, GitPush, GitPull, GitMatch, GitMit, GitCommit, and GitStatus.""For us, Gitlab's most valuable feature is the integration with Cypress. We're using Cypress as an automation tool, so we're using GitLab as a tool for running in parallel.""I have found the most valuable feature is security control. I also like the branching and cloning software.""GitLab's best features are maintenance, branch integration, and development infrastructure.""The most valuable features of GitLab are the review, patch repo, and plans are in YAML.""We have seen a couple of merge requests or pull requests raised in GitLab. I see the interface, the way it shows the difference between the two source codes, that it is easy for anyone to do the review and then accept the request; the pull request is the valuable feature.""I like GitLab from the CI/CD perspective. It is much easier to set up CI/CD and then integrate with other tools."

More GitLab Pros →

"The product's network and intrusion protection features are valuable. It also has rules and compliance features for security.""Another thing that I like about Sonatype is that if you download something today, and five days from today it becomes vulnerable, it will notify you."

More Sonatype Repository Firewall Pros →

Cons
"Based on what I know so far, its integration with Kubernetes is not so good. We have to develop many things to make it work. We have to acquire third-party components to work with Kubernetes.""The documentation is confusing.""Some of the scripts that we encountered in GitLab were not fully functional and threw up errors.""Atlassian offers more products than GitLab. GitLab offers source control management, version control and collaboration between developers. Atlassian offers features on top of this as well as more integration points for developers.""It's more related to the supporting layer of features, such as issue management and issue tracking. We tend to always use, for example, Jira next to it. That doesn't mean that GitLab should build something similar to Jira because that will always have its place, but they could grow a bit in those kinds of supporting features. I see some, for example, covering ITSM on a DevOps team level, and that's one of the things that I and my current client would find really helpful. It's understandably not going to be their main focus and their core, and whenever you are with a company that needs a bit more advanced features on that specific topic, you're probably still going to integrate with another tool like Jira Service Management, for example. However, some basic features on things like that could be really helpful.""It can be free for commercial use.""I don't really like the new Kubernetes integration because it is pretty focused on the on-premise environment, but we're in a hybrid environment.""We'd always like to see better pricing on the product."

More GitLab Cons →

"What I don't like is the lack of an option to pick up the phone and call someone for support. That is something they need to improve on. They need to have a professional services package, or they need to include that option with their services.""The tool needs to improve its file systems. The product should also include zero test feature."

More Sonatype Repository Firewall Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."
  • "The price is okay."
  • "It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."
  • "Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."
  • "It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."
  • "I don't mind the price because I use the free version."
  • "We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."
  • "The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."
  • More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is reasonable if you're a large enterprise developing code. It's not super-expensive."
  • More Sonatype Repository Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.
    Top Answer:For small-scale usage, GitLab offers a free tier. For enterprise pricing, GitLab is more expensive than GitHub, as it's not as widely adopted. GitLab is the preferred choice for many developers… more »
    Top Answer:I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities. Better integration and usability within the pipeline could make a significant… more »
    Top Answer:The product's network and intrusion protection features are valuable. It also has rules and compliance features for security.
    Top Answer:The product helps with vulnerability and security assessment. It also helps with assessment at the configuration level.
    Ranking
    Views
    4,611
    Comparisons
    3,608
    Reviews
    50
    Average Words per Review
    406
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    793
    Comparisons
    391
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    105
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Fuzzit
    Sonatype Nexus Firewall, Nexus Firewall
    Learn More
    Overview

    GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster. 

    It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring. 

    With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

    Sonatype Repository Firewall is a cloud-based security solution designed to safeguard your software supply chain against malicious components. It operates by meticulously scanning and evaluating each new component against customized governance policies, thereby effectively identifying and blocking potential threats before they infiltrate your development pipeline. What sets Sonatype Repository Firewall apart is its user-friendly setup, seamless integration with existing workflows, and remarkable scalability, making it suitable for software development environments of any size. Key features include blocking malicious components through behavioral analysis, malware scanning, and vulnerability assessment, as well as the ability to enforce custom governance policies. By utilizing this tool, organizations can enhance their software supply chain security, mitigate risks related to supply chain attacks, bolster compliance with industry standards, and ultimately reduce costs associated with security incidents. 

    Sample Customers
    1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
    EDF, Tomitribe, Crosskey, Blackboard, Travel audience
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization25%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Government9%
    Computer Software Company6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise34%
    Large Enterprise51%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    GitLab vs. Sonatype Repository Firewall
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Sonatype Repository Firewall and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitLab is ranked 7th in Application Security Tools with 70 reviews while Sonatype Repository Firewall is ranked 34th in Application Security Tools with 3 reviews. GitLab is rated 8.6, while Sonatype Repository Firewall is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sonatype Repository Firewall writes "You will get clean code every time, and that's a great achievement". GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, SonarQube, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline and Tekton, whereas Sonatype Repository Firewall is most compared with JFrog Xray, Cisco Secure Firewall, Black Duck, GitHub and Snyk. See our GitLab vs. Sonatype Repository Firewall report.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.