We performed a comparison between Goliath Performance Monitor and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."I like that it not only has the ability to monitor but that it can do a lot of specific Citrix monitoring."
"Offers a diversity of features."
"The search function for spam is like a google search. You just enter and it will quickly show you the results."
"Splunk is a user-friendly solution."
"Exporting is a good feature. It helps me out when I have to do reports. I do a lot of exporting and crunching of the numbers. Dashboards are okay for showing to the leadership, but for doing statistics and updating tickets, the export feature is very beneficial for me."
"Compared to IBM QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security offers faster alert resolution."
"It is very stable. We have not had any problems."
"The feature that I have found most valuable with Splunk is the ability to sift through a bunch of data very quickly."
"We have a one stop dashboard for health of some of our services where you can click in and it takes you to other dashboards that have custom near real-time metrics that show the application's health."
"The Splunk user community and forum are most valuable."
"I would love to be able to tell what ISP the user is coming from."
"Issues with generating reports; consistency is not there."
"I feel as though a major focus of upcoming releases should be set on Machine Learning, Predictive Analytics, and I would enjoy to see more security focused add-ons and apps developed by the vendor."
"Not even Splunk's support guy, who came to our firm, could help with defining proper role management."
"While Splunkbase (the app repository) has a lot of great content, some apps are terribly old and could stand to be updated or purged."
"The algorithms customization of Splunk could improve. They have limited algorithms for machine learning support. If they can allow the user to add more machine learning algorithms, such as the ability to choose the algorithm that a user might want. Additionally, they should provide the required libraries for those algorithms, and then analyzes the data for use."
"The integration with all our tool sets felt like we were reinventing the wheel, which was a pain point for us."
"Splunk could improve its default machine-learning models. Also, Splunk Enterprise's native threat intelligence isn't that good. I prefer a custom threat intelligence model."
". Having a trial version or more training on Splunk would be helpful."
"Splunk Enterprise Security could improve in automation, flexibility, and providing more content out of the box."
Earn 20 points
Goliath Performance Monitor is ranked 62nd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 246 reviews. Goliath Performance Monitor is rated 7.6, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Goliath Performance Monitor writes "Monitors well with Citrix, stable, and the support is very responsive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Goliath Performance Monitor is most compared with ControlUp and Zabbix, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, IBM Security QRadar, Dynatrace, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
