We performed a comparison between HCL AppScan and Spirent CyberFlood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It highlights, with several grades of severity, the types of vulnerabilities, so we can focus on the most severe security vulnerabilities in the code."
"The solution is easy to use."
"This solution saves us time due to the low number of false positives detected."
"The UI was very intuitive."
"The static scans are good, and the SaaS as well."
"It comes with all of the templates that we need. For example, we are a company that is regulated by PCI. In order to be PCI compliant, we have a lot of checks and procedures to which we have to comply."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution...The initial setup or installation of HCL AppScan is easy."
"This is a stable solution."
"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."
"CyberFlood is flexible."
"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."
"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."
"The solution could improve by having a mobile version."
"Scans become slow on large websites."
"Sometimes it doesn't work so well."
"One thing which I think can be improved is the CI/CD Integration"
"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."
"The solution needs to improve in some areas. The tool needs to add more languages. It also needs to improve its speed."
"I would like to see the roadmap for this product. We are still waiting to see it as we have only so many resources."
"They should have a better UI for dashboards."
"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."
"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."
"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."
"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."
HCL AppScan is ranked 14th in Application Security Tools with 41 reviews while Spirent CyberFlood is ranked 34th in Application Security Tools with 4 reviews. HCL AppScan is rated 7.8, while Spirent CyberFlood is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of HCL AppScan writes " A stable and scalable product useful for application security scanning". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spirent CyberFlood writes "I like the solution's flexibility". HCL AppScan is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Acunetix, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and OWASP Zap, whereas Spirent CyberFlood is most compared with Ixia BreakingPoint and Ixia BreakingPoint VE. See our HCL AppScan vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
