We performed a comparison between IBM DevOps Test UI and Katalon Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."
"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."
"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."
"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."
"We are now performing automated testing in 15 minutes, which were previously taking a long time when doing it manually."
"Video capture on failure is a must have. A picture is worth a thousand words. A video is worth a thousand pictures (literally)."
"The most valuable feature of Katalon Studio is the ease of use of the solution."
"I rate Katalon Studio's scalability a four out of five."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward and easy enough to complete."
"The best thing about the solution is that there is a record and playback functionality."
"It supports multiple easy-to-learn languages."
"It is a good tool and provides all the essential features for our business requirements."
"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."
"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."
"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."
"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."
"I would like to see improvements in how Katalon Studio works with iOS applications, especially with React Native applications."
"The price of the solution is a bit high. It's one of the reasons we decided not to continue using the product."
"Katalon lacks integration with other software, including integrating other languages like .NET and PHP."
"Katalon Studio should improve its usability, it still needs some improvement where users can easily use it to build their automation suite. It requires some initial work to set it up. There should be more keywords in the library to limit the coding requirements, this will allow a non-technical person easily start using it, which would be better."
"The solution can be further improved with better loading time."
"Currently, I'm the only one who can use it because I have a Mac. It is giving a hard time to my team members who are on Linux. My team members are using Linux, and Katalon doesn't support Linux very well. It keeps on crashing. It crashes and shuts down almost every time they save their work, so they are not able to use it. It should have good support for Linux. We don't know what the problem is. If the Katalon team can pick up this issue, it will be very helpful."
"Katalon Studio could improve having visual testing, but I think they're launching that feature very soon. We would like to see an increase in the usage of AI."
"The price of Katalon Studio is an area of concern where improvement is required."
IBM DevOps Test UI is ranked 10th in Regression Testing Tools with 8 reviews while Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Regression Testing Tools with 42 reviews. IBM DevOps Test UI is rated 7.2, while Katalon Studio is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM DevOps Test UI writes "Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes " Functional automation features and the recording functionality saves time but the performance and script execution is slow ". IBM DevOps Test UI is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, HCL OneTest, Worksoft Certify and OpenText UFT One, whereas Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Testim and Appium. See our IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Katalon Studio report.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.