We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and Logsign Next-Gen SIEM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Vulnerability detection is the most valuable feature. It's the tool that finds the threats."
"Due to the skills shortage, we are able to use it from the standpoint of bringing in a lower level employee or a person who may not have security knowledge."
"Flexible and valuable product that is modular, so you can easily set up a roadmap for your clients."
"It's built around Red Hat Linux, which is highly robust."
"It protect us from multiple authentication values, unauthorized access and antivirus threats."
"The features that I have found most valuable in QRadar are its data enrichment, use case creations, and adding references - those kinds of features are very good. Also QRadar's event filtration and device integration are perfect."
"The support is very good. We get support whenever we need it. Sometimes they respond immediately and sometimes it will be within 24 hours. We can ask them to please do it right away and they can get a request done within an hour or two."
"We've found the solution to be scalable."
"Logsign provides sample logs within the product, allowing users to see how logs will appear before integration, which is a valuable feature for testing and understanding log formats."
"The most valuable features of Logsign SIEM are its cloud capabilities, alerting functionality, integration with Elastic Search, and configuration options."
"There was some complexity in the initial setup due to bandwidth issues."
"The product is good, but one feature they should have is an Elasticsearch. Currently, in QRadar, there are no Elasticsearch criteria."
"Ideally we would like a mobile version so that any alert that comes in will notify us in a mobile app, or by using SMS integration."
"The threat intelligence functionality can be better. In addition, it can have more monitoring capabilities."
"Some of the cloud apps need improvement."
"The tech support is not that good."
"The modularity could be improved."
"It would be better if it were more stable and more secure. The price for maintenance could be better. It's too high. In the next release, I think they should focus on the price and the operation."
"Improvements needed in Logsign SIEM are providing specific security alerts that can be filtered and configured more effectively."
"I hope they address the pricing model for Logsign Next-Gen SIEM, especially regarding regional variations. The pricing should not differ based on the country of operation as it can lead to dissatisfaction among customers. A fixed pricing structure would be more favorable for us. I would also suggest enhancing the GUI interface and adding features similar to xFi Exchange from IBM Pure. This would streamline operations and save time for analysts."
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 4th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 198 reviews while Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is ranked 39th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 3 reviews. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Logsign Next-Gen SIEM writes "Easy to use and find the features that you need". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is most compared with Grafana Loki, Wazuh, Logpoint and ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM report.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors and best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.