We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and RSA enVision based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Flexible and valuable product that is modular, so you can easily set up a roadmap for your clients."
"Most of the features are good. It is an excellent solution."
"QRadar shows very effective correlations. If you combine all the logins plus user behavior and the current intelligence, it gives a very good correlation for business. I think it reduces the false positives in user activity monitoring because there is a lot of social information to correlate with other data."
"IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics's most important feature is its ease of use."
"The ability to add extensions is the most valuable feature. For example, extensions that provide valuable test ports."
"The monitoring and dashboards are great."
"We've found the solution to be scalable."
"There are other third-party plugins that we can use."
"The configuration part is very easy...The technical support was sincere in their responses...I rate the technical support a nine out of ten."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the reporting."
"The most valuable feature is the management features. It's capable of managing large enterprises."
"The API integration for AD is a problem when it comes to vulnerability management. If you want to incorporate multiple factor authentication it becomes a problem with the AD. It doesn't integrate well. That needs to be improved."
"I don't look at only the features and benefits; I also look at the price. It is a bit expensive when compared with other solutions. It is expensive for specific deployment topologies, and the decision-makers go for alternatives like ArcSight. It should also have more AI features or capabilities for better threat intelligence. The more it uses machine learning, the better would be the dashboard, analytics, and other things."
"I would suggest QRadar release any documentation or give an online demo, like videos on YouTube. It would increase publicity and public appeal."
"Technical support could be improved by a bit."
"They have to build more quantitative monitoring, profiling, and make it more predictive."
"QVM is another instance where they need to revise the vulnerability scoring and the proper remediation details."
"The solution should enhance its capabilities of UEBA and AI/ML tech modeling."
"They should provide more manual examples online so that I can learn it myself."
"RSA enVision log manager is out of date and is not in use anymore."
"In general, the solution currently isn't user-friendly."
"The integration could be easier, it should support more products."
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 4th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 198 reviews while RSA enVision is ranked 36th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 5 reviews. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while RSA enVision is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA enVision writes "Though the solution offers good technical support, it needs to be made more user-friendly ". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas RSA enVision is most compared with NetWitness Platform, Splunk Enterprise Security and Microsoft Sentinel. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. RSA enVision report.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.