We performed a comparison between Inflectra Rapise and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."
"It's pretty straightforward to set up."
"Some of the most valuable features of this solution are open-source, they have good support, good community support, and it supports multiple languages whether you use C-Sharp or not. These are some of the most important benefits."
"The initial setup is straightforward. Deployment took about seven months."
"It is a good automation tool."
"The plugins, the components, and the method of the library with Selenium is very user defined."
"The most valuable aspect of Selenium is that it gives you the flexibility to customize or write your own code, your own features, etc. It's not restricted by licensing."
"Selenium HQ's most valuable feature is its online community support, which is comprehensive and easy to access."
"It is very stable."
"The testing solution produces the best web applications."
"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."
"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."
"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."
"In the beginning, we had issues with several test cases failing during regression. Over a period of time, we built our own framework around Selenium which helped us overcome of these issues."
"Whenever an object is changed or something is changed in the UI, then we have to refactor the code."
"I would like to see some reporting or test management tools."
"Could have additional readability and abstraction."
"Selenium uses a layer-based approach that is somewhat slower than Eggplant when it comes to executing code."
"Selenium Grid set-up is bit complex."
"Improvement in Selenium's ability to identify and wait for the page/element to load would be a big plus. This would ensure that our failed test cases will drop by 60%."
"Selenium has room for improvement as it does not support the tests and result-sharing in anything but a manual way."
Inflectra Rapise is ranked 22nd in Test Automation Tools with 7 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 4th in Regression Testing Tools with 103 reviews. Inflectra Rapise is rated 7.2, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Inflectra Rapise writes "The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Easy to use with great pricing and lots of documentation". Inflectra Rapise is most compared with Katalon Studio, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and Automation Anywhere (AA). See our Inflectra Rapise vs. Selenium HQ report.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.