We performed a comparison between Infor LN and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are manufacturing, and manufacturing costing modules. These are all powerful features of Infor LN."
"The best thing about Infor LN is that you can use it for inter-company business and for international businesses, especially by mid-sized and big companies."
"We have definitely seen a return on our investment with the product."
"The most valuable feature is its ability to handle products with up to 2,500 components, making it valuable for streamlining complex business operations."
"Our clients appreciate the financial part of the solution, which is usually very complex. The Spanish localization is also very good."
"It has strong sales, purchase, warehousing, and logistics order management."
"Most of them who use Infor LN have add-ons connected to ERP. It's either a supplier exchange, or they've got sales problems that are integrated with it."
"The best feature of this solution is it comes as a complete bundle. The solution has effective project, document, and application management. Additionally, the collaboration is fantastic, it is well integrated, and can be customized."
"It is scalable enough. We have over a hundred end users using it."
"The solution's most valuable features are performance and processes."
"It is a very scalable solution. We have enterprise-level businesses using this solution."
"Because I'm a procure-to-pay consultant, I mostly look at that angle, and I have a bit of experience with sales and distribution. I also like the integration between S/4HANA and other ERPs because S/4HANA is a suite. For example, the integration between S/4HANA and EWM Transportation Management, and Ariba."
"SAP S/4HANA dominates around 70 percent of the ERP market in Chile, and I believe this isn't merely coincidental. I've always maintained that if someone believes SAP S/4HANA lacks a certain functionality, they haven't explored it thoroughly. However, there's a widespread lack of understanding regarding its full potential and how to configure it."
"One of the most valuable features, which we used the most, was the FI module, for finance. It involved controlling, account receivables, account payables, and complete financial steering."
"Provides SAP Fiori apps with numerous dashboards and KPIs"
"The key modules that I find most valuable are material management (MM), financial accounting and controlling (FICO), and human resources (HR)."
"The interface can be difficult sometimes. I need to apply a bar code system, such as business intelligence and user interface tools. The user has to be a technician sometimes to use it."
"In general, the HR-related part of Infor LN doesn't work properly in Germany, making it an area that requires improvement."
"It's not that intuitive."
"Infor LN has customer support in India, but service could be improved. So, basically, they prioritize agreements, and the number of tickets closed within a certain timeframe, not necessarily the quality or resolution of the tickets themselves. They just open and close them, sometimes without even understanding the issue. That's the biggest problem."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"The finance model within this solution does not have very strong reporting functionality, which I would like to see improved."
"The training for Infor LN is not straightforward, so a non-specialist will need training before using it."
"The solution’s performance could be improved."
"So, there is room for improvement in pricing. HANA is not a simple product; it's quite complex by design."
"Planned Order List needs a change of screen."
"Maybe its user interface and reporting can be improved across the board, but it is manageable."
"It is simple to implement SAP S4HANA. If you are already in this type of environment, then the transition is not very complex. However, if you do not then it can be difficult."
"Documentation could be improved."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"Their yearly licensing is expensive. Improvements are needed on the user experience level and digital work."
"Starting out on the solution can be a bit complex and difficult."
Infor LN is ranked 8th in ERP with 25 reviews while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 75 reviews. Infor LN is rated 8.2, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infor LN writes "A flexible ERP with the best project module and excellent support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". Infor LN is most compared with SAP ERP, Infor M3, Infor LX, Infor CloudSuite and Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Infor M3. See our Infor LN vs. SAP S/4HANA report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.