We performed a comparison between Infraon Desk and SCSM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Infraon Desk is very flexible in nature and can be customized for my needs. The fact that I can customize it the way I want is the best part of the tool for me."
"There are a few dashboards and they are helpful because, in our organization, we have different groups of people who need different kinds of dashboards... as head of network operations, I need a top-level view. I want to see how many calls are open and how many calls are pending, on average, and some trend analysis. Whereas a manager in my team might like to see slightly more detail."
"It is a simple solution that is easy to configure."
"I like the reporting service. SCSM has a good reporting service and analysis service for analysis requests."
"We've been in contact with Microsoft technical support mainly. After doing the research ourselves and troubleshooting, etc., if we can't find a permanent solution, we contact Microsoft to help us fix the issue. Sometimes the issue never gets fixed even by Microsoft. It can sometimes require us to reinstall the solution. However, these are very rare instances."
"I've used SCSM a lot, and its features are valuable."
"Many more features than other comparable products."
"The support from Microsoft is good and we also have local support on the ground in Nigeria."
"SCSM is easy to learn because all of the material, including training videos, can be found online."
"We use SCSM to manage all of our IT operations, including incident and service requests and problem management."
"Better connectivity and integration with more collaborative platforms would be helpful."
"The reporting is okay, but it doesn't give you reports that make you say "wow," like you might see from a tool like MRTG or PRTG whose reports give you a good feeling. The detailing is not there in the Infraon Desk reports and there are no graphical elements in them. The reporting is slightly weak and needs to be improved."
"It's not too hard to compile stuff but it is hard to manage the solution. Even the design itself makes it difficult for management."
"The product needs to improve its integration with other tools. It also needs to have a better UI and a simple dashboard."
"Resources for understanding compliance and relative compliance need to be made available."
"Better integration with other services in Azure is needed because everything is moving from on-premises to the cloud, and as an integrator, we have to help our clients with the migration."
"One of the disadvantages in this product is that the reporting module is not very easy. It requires SQL development skills, which not all customers or IT professionals have."
"Once we had an issue with a desktop download that would not open."
"The price of this solution is high and it needs to be cheaper."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
Earn 20 points
Infraon Desk is ranked 37th in IT Service Management (ITSM) while SCSM is ranked 11th in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 23 reviews. Infraon Desk is rated 7.6, while SCSM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Infraon Desk writes "Helps us monitor customer ticket SLAs and enables us to understand why SLAs are missed and to improve our processes as a result". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCSM writes "Helps us manage IT operations, including incident and service requests, but could be easier to create reports". Infraon Desk is most compared with , whereas SCSM is most compared with ServiceNow, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, JIRA Service Management, BMC Helix ITSM and BeyondTrust Remote Support. See our Infraon Desk vs. SCSM report.
See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors and best Help Desk Software vendors.
We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
