We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons for RBVM and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management."Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it."
"The most valuable features of Qualys VM are its ability to do proper vulnerability assessment. It has a lot of updates for all the vulnerability databases from all over the globe. It's an amazing solution when it comes to the versatility of the features it has. Additionally, the reports are very good. It generates very detailed reports about the vulnerabilities inside the environment"
"Vulnerability management is the most valuable one and it’s a must in every organization."
"Qualys VM has allowed us to know the vulnerabilities we need to prioritize based on the threat levels and the possible impact if there's an intrusion."
"Detects new hosts along with vulnerabilities."
"It's a good product. After the scan our internet works well. It scans our security posture."
"We also like the flexibility in their licensing."
"The integrations for this solution are very good. I use a different product for virtual patching of vulnerabilities and Qualys integrates well with that product."
"Technical support is fantastic."
"I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7 has."
"The only improvement I can think of is on the implementation side. At times it is a bit slow."
"Qualys VM's machine learning and artificial intelligence features could be improved."
"Qualys VMDR is basically susceptible to false positives, and false negatives."
"Some of the older features could be polished instead of focusing on releasing new features."
"We face issues while scanning multiple assets."
"Its integration with ServiceNow and other similar products is complicated and can be improved. It should also have virtual batching. They should support more standards and compliance requirements and more customizations. For policy compliance, they can add the standards required by the countries in the Middle East. Each country generates its own standards and frameworks, and those frameworks should be there in all products, not only in Qualys. The market here is huge, especially in the cybersecurity field. Qatar has a framework for Qatar 2022, and each and every company in the public or private sector has to follow the Qatar 2022 framework."
"Qualys could improve the inbuilt dashboards."
"It is a struggle to be able to pull our report and to be able to do onboarding using automated tools."
Earn 20 points
Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is ranked 32nd in Vulnerability Management while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews. Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is rated 9.0, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for RBVM writes "Useful for vulnerability management with many integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is most compared with Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus and Brinqa, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
