We performed a comparison between JBoss and Oracle WebLogic Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Server solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the UI."
"JBoss is a scalable tool."
"The tool's most beneficial feature is its scalability. People with limited technical knowledge can quickly grasp its functions with a brief introduction. The tool's ease of use makes it a plug-and-play solution, reducing the effort required to train users on its usage."
"The greatest benefit of JBoss is that it was procured by IBM, thereby offering exceptional support for our banking operations."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"The stability is great."
"We can deploy the applications on the JBoss server, so it is easy to manage. It's also easy to add new certificates to the config."
"There's good documentation and a pretty good community surrounding the product."
"In WebLogic, the most useful feature is the UI administration console from where we can configure everything, such as security access, and we can start and stop it graphically. That's the best feature of WebLogic Server."
"Oracle WebLogic Server has a bunch of ready features that are easy to use and understand."
"We have some hosted servers as well as some of our own. It performs well."
"It is good because it's easy to use. It doesn't crash frequently like other servers."
"Oracle WebLogic Server is secure."
"The product's installation phase is easy."
"The product is flexible and allows us to leverage deployments."
"Oracle WebLogic Server is more secure and has full functionalities that can be used for big applications."
"The solution sometimes crashed and had some compatibility issues with the DevOps JAR file."
"Having the support combined with Red Hat support would be an improvement."
"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product could be made cheaper."
"JBoss is not as reliable and stable as WebLogic."
"The documentation could be better. When we have questions, we need to check multiple websites. There isn't one place listing a set of common problems and how to fix them."
"The solution's documentation could be better."
"In general, the support of the ERPC would be really good due to the fact that, so far, I have not seen it."
"The solution's pricing could be improved because it is not cheap."
"The ticket-raising process is very time-consuming"
"They should improve the solution's garbage collection feature."
"The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved."
"The cost could always be lower."
"I've had issues with some of the tracking features tracking and have had to go back to several generations of code to fix problems where things were touched."
"The quarterly updates can sometimes lead to instability depending on the configuration of systems."
"Configuration can be a significant challenge, demanding a deep understanding and expertise."
"If you want to use Oracle products to the fullest with enhanced customizations, you need to get trained. There is enough documentation and the flexibility to configure the application to your needs but you will need to spend more time gathering the knowledge."
JBoss is ranked 3rd in Application Server with 24 reviews while Oracle WebLogic Server is ranked 1st in Application Server with 33 reviews. JBoss is rated 8.4, while Oracle WebLogic Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of JBoss writes "A flexible and stable solution that is cost-efficient compared to other products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebLogic Server writes "Offers efficient load distribution with a scope of high scalability ". JBoss is most compared with Tomcat, IBM WebSphere Application Server, IIS, Oracle GlassFish and TmaxSoft JEUS, whereas Oracle WebLogic Server is most compared with Tomcat, Oracle Application Server, Oracle Fusion Middleware, IBM WebSphere Application Server and IIS. See our JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server report.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
