Jitterbit Harmony vs Qlik Replicate comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Jitterbit Logo
647 views|545 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Qlik Logo
6,009 views|4,955 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Jitterbit Harmony and Qlik Replicate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Jitterbit Harmony vs. Qlik Replicate Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors).""Integrity, ease of use, user-friendly user interface, and errorless logs are the most valuable features.""The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations.""We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate.""It is a scalable solution.""It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput.""Jitterbit provides the ability to quickly map data between files and databases.""Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried."

More Jitterbit Harmony Pros →

"Qlik Replicate stands out with its cutting-edge technology and its ability to handle diverse data management tasks. This powerful tool allows us to efficiently and swiftly load data into various data stores or destinations, while also enabling easy distribution across different endpoints. A notable feature is its capability to reload data from multiple sources by creating multiple tasks within a brief timeframe of fifteen to twenty minutes. This eliminates the need for manual intervention and ensures quick data loading from different tables.""Support has been great.""Low-priced reporting and analytics solution, with good scalability and stability. It has on-premises and cloud versions that are cohesive and can integrate well.""A pretty good series of connectors is one of the best features of Qlik Replicate.""Great with replicating and updating records.""We use Qlik Replicate to change data capture of databases in production environments.""A valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is that you do not need ETL. It's easy to use—you choose two systems and it automatically replicates them. Even if there is no CDC available, if you insert it and update it, and there is nothing to find out, then you can use Qlik Replicate. It's a good product.""The most useful functions of Qlik Replicate are the data manipulation to transformations."

More Qlik Replicate Pros →

Cons
"The initial setup can be a little bit difficult.""Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs.""I know with Salesforce updating the UI like they did, it slowed it down a lot.""You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes.""I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security.""There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data.""Sometimes additional connectors are needed.""Its API management capabilities need improvement."

More Jitterbit Harmony Cons →

"Support for this product is not great. It needs to be improved.""Some features can also be overly dependent on each other. So, there is room for improvement.""It's not possible to replicate the QVC files in data analytics.""Support-wise, this solution is in need of improvement.""When you remote into it the Qlik Replicate UI a lot of times it just freezes. We set up the EC2, to allow them to go to the server and click on the Replicate icon, it just opens up and just sits there. At that point, we have to go into the EC2 and then reboot the server. This should be fixed, it is frustrating.""We would like to see more details in messages about errors with the system.""In the next release, I would like to see closer integration with data catalyst.""The solution's flexibility to work with APIs should also be improved since it is very weak in working with APIs."

More Qlik Replicate Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Each business needs to determine if it is a mission critical aspect."
  • "The added bonus is that Jitterbit doesn't charge for any data volume/traffic."
  • "I do believe Jitterbit has one of the better pricing and licensing options out there compared to its competitors."
  • "Jitterbit was extremely cost effective for us compared to other options."
  • "The Jitterbit price is based upon endpoints. They also offer ERP connectors with their Enterprise edition"
  • "The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors."
  • More Jitterbit Harmony Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Qlik Replicate is not expensive, compared to GoldenGate."
  • "Pricing for this solution is very reasonable."
  • "Overall, Qlik is an expensive solution. You need to pay for all additional features that you would like to use."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Qlik Replicate's pricing a nine out of ten."
  • "Unlike Azure, where you pay based on consumption, Qlik Replicate seems to charge per endpoint."
  • More Qlik Replicate Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors. I rate its pricing a six out of ten.
    Top Answer:The solution's API management capabilities need improvement.
    Top Answer:The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data… more »
    Top Answer:I wish Qlik Replicate had better built-in scheduling for initial table copies (ITCs) and full loads. Some features can also be overly dependent on each other. So, there is room for improvement. For… more »
    Top Answer:We basically use it for fulfilling our data anayltics purpose. Our client is a major global semiconductor company. We use the tool to prepare data for analysis.
    Ranking
    35th
    out of 101 in Data Integration
    Views
    647
    Comparisons
    545
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    234
    Rating
    9.0
    16th
    out of 101 in Data Integration
    Views
    6,009
    Comparisons
    4,955
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    362
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Jitterbit, Jitterbit Harmony
    Replicate, Qlik Replicate
    Learn More
    Overview

    Open source integration platform designed to handle the most complex integration challenges between legacy, enterprise and On-Demand applications. 

    Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution for replicating data from one source database to another for business intelligence software. It offers data manipulation and transformations, replication without impacting source databases, and ease of use without needing ETL. The solution is stable and user-friendly, with detailed logging and support. 

    Qlik Replicate has improved the organization by allowing each team to replicate their data into a single-source data location. The most important feature of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate and update records without needing a programmer.

    Sample Customers
    LA Metro, Mophie, Club Auto, University of Miami, Exostar, Dialog Direct, Avero, Greenpoint Technologies, Berklee Online, Odyssey, KeyedIn Solutions, Swish Maintenance, SPP Pumps Limited, Talent Plus, Ricoh Canada, Televerde, Reed Construction Data, Sika US, Sunkist Growers
    American Cancer Society, Fanzz, SM Retail, Smart Modular, Tangerine Bank, Wellcare
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Government25%
    Computer Software Company25%
    Manufacturing Company25%
    Financial Services Firm25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Insurance Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business67%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise56%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Jitterbit Harmony vs. Qlik Replicate
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Jitterbit Harmony vs. Qlik Replicate and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 35th in Data Integration with 13 reviews while Qlik Replicate is ranked 16th in Data Integration with 13 reviews. Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6, while Qlik Replicate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qlik Replicate writes " Performs well with batch-wise data applications but some features can also be overly dependent on each other". Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Azure Data Factory, Mule Anypoint Platform, MuleSoft Composer and SnapLogic, whereas Qlik Replicate is most compared with Oracle GoldenGate, AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Compose, Azure Data Factory and Fivetran. See our Jitterbit Harmony vs. Qlik Replicate report.

    See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.