We performed a comparison between Katalon Studio and Telerik Test Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is that the browser and the API testing is available in a single tool, and I don't have to look at other options."
"It is easy for a non-technical person to use and adopt."
"The solution is easy to learn."
"One of the features that I like is Object Recognition. It worked very well, and it allowed me to create a dynamic expert based on my requirements."
"This is a product that is well ahead of its immediate competition in features and functionality."
"It is a good tool and provides all the essential features for our business requirements."
"The recording feature of this product is very valuable for our testing purposes."
"The functionality of the data is very good. You can upload and disperse data using the solution."
"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."
"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."
"The way it identifies elements is good."
"The performance and load testing are very good."
"I've seen that our clients are not truly aware of the power behind Katalon."
"There could potentially be more reporting within the solution. We need more issue reports, for example."
"It should start working on Silverlight automation."
"What it lacks is the Selenium Grid capabilities."
"I would like to see improvements in how Katalon Studio works with iOS applications, especially with React Native applications."
"Its stability needs improvement."
"Support options need improvement. It is sometimes hard to find a solution to any given problem, thus you are forced to use another solution."
"We would like to see improved integration with various reporting tools; this would make our testing data more complete."
"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."
"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."
"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."
"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."
"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."
Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Regression Testing Tools with 42 reviews while Telerik Test Studio is ranked 9th in Regression Testing Tools with 5 reviews. Katalon Studio is rated 7.8, while Telerik Test Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes " Functional automation features and the recording functionality saves time but the performance and script execution is slow ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Telerik Test Studio writes "Very good performance and load testing capabilities". Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Testim and Appium, whereas Telerik Test Studio is most compared with Selenium HQ, Ranorex Studio, SmartBear TestComplete, Tricentis Tosca and Visual Studio Test Professional. See our Katalon Studio vs. Telerik Test Studio report.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors, best Test Automation Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.