We performed a comparison between Katalon Studio and UiPath Test Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ability to build all libraries with codes and use them in many situations has been most valuable."
"The best thing about the solution is that there is a record and playback functionality."
"The most important feature is the Jenkins integration; it is pretty straight forward and allows us to run nightly builds."
"The most valuable feature of Katalon Studio is visual testing. It compares the look and feel of an application which is useful."
"I personally like the 'Object Spy' feature of this tool. It makes it easy to find an element on the web page."
"The most valuable feature is that the browser and the API testing is available in a single tool, and I don't have to look at other options."
"This solution is very user-friendly to learn and implement, and less technical knowledge is required to handle automation."
"It is good for API testing. It is also good for continuous integration testing. You can connect it to Jenkins."
"In terms of integration with other lifecycle tools and applications, UiPath Test Suite works very well because of the basis of RPA, and how RPA and automation can handle different applications and different areas of expertise."
"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."
"UiPath's most valuable features are reusability and low-code aspects. It works across both desktop and web applications."
"We also don't develop test robots like typing codes; we program them with drag-and-drop features."
"It's useful for automating tasks."
"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."
"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."
"The document understanding is good."
"It would be helpful to have an automatic save feature."
"Support options need improvement. It is sometimes hard to find a solution to any given problem, thus you are forced to use another solution."
"During parallel execution, some reports are randomly switched."
"The free version of the solution is not user friendly at all."
"The integration process with Jira should be enhanced and facilitated."
"I would like to see improvements in how Katalon Studio works with iOS applications, especially with React Native applications."
"There is not much support offered for the free version, which is something that could be improved."
"The product is comparatively slow."
"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."
"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."
"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."
"We have output arguments in the workflow. We can check results only by using those arguments. It would be better to have some more options, such as screen variables. For example, in a workflow, if we want to check if an activity is present inside, we should be able to get the output to UiPath Test Suite through the activity itself. That would be great for testing."
"I'd like the solution to be even more automated."
"The test manager component could be improved."
"The product releases sometimes have issues."
"I don't rate its ability to automate very well."
Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Test Automation Tools with 42 reviews while UiPath Test Suite is ranked 6th in Test Automation Tools with 17 reviews. Katalon Studio is rated 7.8, while UiPath Test Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes " Functional automation features and the recording functionality saves time but the performance and script execution is slow ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Test Suite writes "Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement". Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Testim and Appium, whereas UiPath Test Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One, SmartBear TestComplete, froglogic Squish and Eggplant Test. See our Katalon Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.