We compared RapidMiner and KNIME based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
RapidMiner stands out for its advanced machine learning algorithms, extensive pre-built models, and active community support, while KNIME is praised for its easy-to-use interface, extensive library of nodes, and excellent customer service. Users note that RapidMiner offers more flexibility and scalability, while KNIME is considered more user-friendly. Both have affordable pricing and positive ROI, but users suggest improvements in documentation and performance for RapidMiner, and enhancements in interface, tutorials, and advanced features for KNIME.
Features: RapidMiner stands out for its user-friendly interface, intuitive data visualization, powerful data preparation and analysis capabilities, and advanced machine learning algorithms. On the other hand, KNIME is praised for its ease of use, powerful data manipulation, extensive library of nodes, and ability to handle big data. Both offer excellent visualizations and seamless integration with other tools and platforms.
Pricing and ROI: In terms of setup cost, RapidMiner offers affordable and flexible pricing options, with a straightforward and transparent licensing approach. On the other hand, KNIME has minimal setup cost and a flexible licensing approach that accommodates the needs of different users and organizations., Based on user feedback, RapidMiner demonstrated positive ROI with increased efficiency, cost savings, and improved decision-making. KNIME also showed favorable ROI with users satisfied with the platform's value.
Room for Improvement: Users have mentioned that RapidMiner could benefit from better documentation and tutorials to help beginners navigate the platform more easily. Additionally, the user interface could be more intuitive and user-friendly. Some users have also suggested improved performance for larger datasets. On the other hand, KNIME users have expressed a desire for a more intuitive interface, better documentation, and tutorials. They have also mentioned performance and speed optimizations, as well as integrating more advanced analytics and machine learning capabilities.
Deployment and customer support: The user reviews suggest that the duration required for establishing a new tech solution can vary between RapidMiner and KNIME. Some RapidMiner users reported spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup, while others mentioned needing a week for both deployment and setup. KNIME users also had similar experiences, with some spending three months on deployment and a week on setup, while others only needed a week for both tasks. It is important to consider the context in which these terms are used to accurately analyze the timeframes., RapidMiner and KNIME both offer excellent customer service. Users appreciate RapidMiner's helpfulness and responsiveness, while KNIME's support team is praised for their prompt and reliable assistance.
The summary above is based on 27 interviews we conducted recently with RapidMiner and KNIME users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"Usability, and organising workflows in very neat manner. Controlling workflow through variables is something amazing."
"From a user-friendliness perspective, it's a great tool."
"Clear view of the data at every step of ETL process enables changing the flow as needed."
"The most valuable is the ability to seamlessly connect operators without the need for extensive programming."
"It has allowed us to easily implement advanced analytics into various processes."
"Automation is most valuable. It allows me to automatically download information from different sources, and once I create a workflow, I can apply it anytime I want. So, there is efficiency at the same time."
"The visual workflow tools for custom and complex tasks always beat raw coding languages with the agility, speed to deliver, and ease of subsequent changes."
"All of the features related to the ETL are fantastic. That includes the connectors to other programs, databases, and the meta node function."
"I like not having to write all solutions from code. Being able to drag and drop controls, enables me to focus on building the best model, without needing to search for syntax errors or extra libraries."
"The most valuable feature of RapidMiner is that it is code free. It is similar to playing with Lego pieces and executing after you are finished to see the results. Additionally, it is easy to use and has interesting utilities when preparing the data. It has a utility to automatically launch a series of models and show the comparisons. When finished with the comparisons you can select the best one, and deploy it automatically."
"Scalability is not really a concern with RapidMiner. It scales very well and can be used in global implementations."
"The best part of RapidMiner is efficiency."
"The most valuable features are the Binary classification and Auto Model."
"Using the GUI, I can have models and algorithms drag and drop nodes."
"The solution is stable."
"It's helpful if you want to make informed decisions using data. We can take the information, tease out the attributes, and label everything. It's suitable for profiling and forecasting in any industry."
"System resource usage. Knime will occupy total system RAM size and other applications will hang."
"The dynamic column name feature could be improved. When attempting to automate processes involving columns, such as with companies, it becomes difficult to achieve the same result when we make changes."
"The license is quite expensive for us."
"There are a lot of tools in the product and it would help if they were grouped into classes where you can select a function, rather than a specific tool."
"From the point of view of the interface, they can do a little bit better."
"KNIME is not good at visualization."
"KNIME is not scalable."
"KNIME can improve by adding more automation tools in the query, similar to UiPath or Blue Prism. It would make the data collection and cleanup duties more versatile."
"I would like to see more integration capabilities."
"The biggest problem, not from a platform process, but from an avoidance process, is when you work in a heavily regulated environment, like banking and finance. Whenever you make a decision or there is an output, you need to bill it as an avoidance to the investigator or to the bank audit team. If you made decisions within this machine learning model, you need to explain why you did so. It would better if you could explain your decision in terms of delivery. However, this is an issue with all ML platforms. Many companies are working heavily in this area to help figure out how to make it more explainable to the business team or the regulator."
"I would like to see all users have access to all of the deep learning models, and that they can be used easily."
"The visual interface could use something like the-drag-and-drop features which other products already support. Some additional features can make RapidMiner a better tool and maybe more competitive."
"Improve the online data services."
"The price of this solution should be improved."
"If they could include video tutorials, people would find that quite helpful."
"A great product but confusing in some way with regard to the user interface and integration with other tools."
KNIME is ranked 4th in Data Science Platforms with 50 reviews while RapidMiner is ranked 6th in Data Science Platforms with 20 reviews. KNIME is rated 8.2, while RapidMiner is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of KNIME writes "A low-code platform that reduces data mining time by linking script". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RapidMiner writes "A no-code tool that helps to build machine learning models ". KNIME is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, Alteryx, Dataiku, Weka and Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, whereas RapidMiner is most compared with Alteryx, Dataiku, Tableau, Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio and IBM SPSS Modeler. See our KNIME vs. RapidMiner report.
See our list of best Data Science Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Of those three you should consider alteryx, it saves time in ETL a lot, Alteryx is better at handling large data sets tan Knime and RapidMiner. But please also consider Dataiku... Up to 3 users it's free ;o)