We performed a comparison between LambdaTest and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel."
"The most valuable features are that it's essentially on-demand, and you only focus on getting the code that needs to be executed without having to worry about the OS, hardware, etc."
"In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues."
"Without a doubt, LambdaTest is one of the big reasons behind our faster deployment and better team collaboration."
"We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring."
"It's user-friendly and offers valuable features for testing, making it a reliable tool."
"The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."
"LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
"It is a good automation tool."
"All the features in Selenium to automate the UI."
"I have found using IDE and Cucumber framework is good."
"In general, I would say that the API set is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features are the ability to test and debug."
"It supports most of the actions that a user would do on a website."
"The stability and performance are good."
"The ability to present your tests on a wiki page and hooking them up to the scripts/fixtures."
"Responsive testing UI is a bit cluttered, whereas the LT browser is much better to use."
"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."
"I didn't like the solution's technical support and how they communicated and tried to fix the issues of customers like me."
"You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only."
"It would be much easier for us to read the test if they provided dashboard analytics."
"Performing automation testing from UI is a little slow and could be improved."
"Their smart testing module needs improvement."
"I think Lambdatest is a valuable tool for our team and things that have room for improvement would be mobile app testing, as it can be an important addition to the tool."
"It would be better if we could use it without having the technical skills to run the scripting test."
"It would be better to have a simplified way to locate and identify web elements."
"One drawback to Selenium is that there is nothing like an object repository, such as that found in QTP, especially considering continuous integration practices that have become common nowadays."
"I have found that at times the tool does not catch the class features of website content correctly. The product's AWS configuration is also hard."
"It would be very great if Selenium would provide some framework examples so newcomers could get started more quickly."
"Selenium HQ doesn't support Windows-based applications, so we need to integrate with the third-party vendor. It would be great if Selenium could include Windows-based automation. You need to integrate it with a third-party tool if you want to upload any files. When we interact with a Windows application, we usually use Tosca."
"It does require a programming skill set. I would like the product not to require a heavy programming skill set and be more user-friendly for someone without a programming background."
"You need to have experience in order to do the initial setup."
LambdaTest is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 21 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 103 reviews. LambdaTest is rated 8.8, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Technical support should be improved, though it has great documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Easy to use with great pricing and lots of documentation". LambdaTest is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca and Perfecto, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and OpenText Silk Test. See our LambdaTest vs. Selenium HQ report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.