We performed a comparison between LambdaTest and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This product offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
"Stability-wise, I have not experienced any downtime or other performance issues."
"LambdaTest is easy to use, and the documentation provides all the needed information."
"Geolocation testing is as straightforward as ticking checkboxes of browsers, operating systems, and countries."
"LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
"In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues."
"The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."
"Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!"
"Visual Studio Test Professional's most valuable feature is the rich IDE for doing code and test development."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"Visual Studio is highly powerful. It's probably the best software development tool on the market."
"The most valuable features of Visual Studio Test Professional are the IntelliSense and the ease of adding the NuGet packages."
"The user interface is very friendly."
"The most valuable feature of Visual Studio Test Professional is its ease of use."
"The product is good to create big or small projects fastly. It is one of the leaders in the area."
"The tool is flexible and easy to manage. We use it since it is scalable and easy to use. It integrates with solutions."
"You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only."
"The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."
"Responsive testing UI is a bit cluttered, whereas the LT browser is much better to use."
"Load flow compared to other stacks needs improvement."
"I feel that the automated screenshot testing takes a little longer on MacOS sometimes."
"The scalability is good with Amazon, but IBM had some issues."
"Their smart testing module needs improvement."
"It would be much easier for us to read the test if they provided dashboard analytics."
"The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."
"The product must provide more automation."
"The solution's documentation could be improved for beginners."
"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."
"I would appreciate some enhancements in the interface, maybe adding more color options."
"It needs more integration with other tools for monitoring. Microsoft also needs to make it more modern to make it work with microservices and the cloud. It is a bit outdated currently."
"I would like to see more integration in the solution."
"The vendor must release a lightweight version of the solution."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
LambdaTest is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 21 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. LambdaTest is rated 8.8, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Technical support should be improved, though it has great documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". LambdaTest is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and Perfecto, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis Tosca. See our LambdaTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
