We performed a comparison between Lenovo XClarity Controller and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Lenovo XClarity is the ease of use because of the interface browser that is highly compatible and it has mobile web management."
"The product's most valuable feature is its ability to provide insights into server status and alerts."
"The best thing about Zabbix is the integration and the APIs that are included are very fast"
"We use it to monitor and manage our servers."
"SNMP monitoring, source discovery, and alert triggering are most valuable."
"It has good graphs of what is going on within the operating system."
"Every new asset placed in the environment can be automatically detected, predicting human failures."
"The integration with third-party tools and the alerts are most valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of virtual machines."
"They've already added extra features, such as noise-canceling and facial recognition, which is great."
"Lenovo XClarity can improve the dashboard integration. For example, graphs could be better. Additionally, more integration with other vendors is needed. For example, VMware has integration with a lot of vendors."
"They could enable notifications on emails and phones regarding control panel information."
"Zabbix is powerful, but it is difficult to understand initially. There are many things that can be improved, but we might not be using Zabbix to its fullest extent. The software has more features than we need."
"We would like to monitor other touchpoints such as ATM machines. It would be great if it can provide monitoring of ATM machines. Compatibility with other products would also be great."
"The performance reporting could be improved."
"The reports are not great and should be improved."
"The solution needs to add remote features."
"Documentation terminology could be improved."
"As far as improvements, sometimes I get a bit frustrated when I move from a previous version to a new one because some configuration has changed—I need to investigate the documentation to deal with some configuration. But it doesn't take much time, so it's okay."
"The main problem with Zabbix is that you have to spend time writing templates for all of the products that you have."
Lenovo XClarity Controller is ranked 16th in Server Monitoring with 2 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Server Monitoring with 101 reviews. Lenovo XClarity Controller is rated 9.0, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Lenovo XClarity Controller writes "Quick scaling, easy to use, and useful mobile management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Lenovo XClarity Controller is most compared with HPE System Management, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor and Huawei iBMC, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core and LibreNMS. See our Lenovo XClarity Controller vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
