We performed a comparison between LogRhythm SIEM and Snare based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."LogRhythm has increased productivity because all the tools that we need are in the web UI, allowing us to find threats on our network fast and efficiently."
"The most valuable features of the solution are network monitoring, user behavior analytics, and log collection."
"It's positively affected our overall rate of efficiency."
"The initial setup is pretty easy."
"I like LogRhythm's ease of use. The solution has improved compared to previous versions. It had many issues before, like integration, the console, creating reports, false positives, etc. The AI engine has made it stronger in the latest version."
"It has centralized monitoring for our security operations. Therefore, it improves our analysts' work."
"The most useful feature that I've found so far is the search function. I like all the different ways you're able to search through metadata and the different ways you're able to correlate or search through logs to find out what's going on."
"Provides visibility into the network."
"Snare has good agents, especially for Windows."
"The best thing about Snare is its format and consistency."
"The most valuable feature of Snare is flexibility or the ability to filter all things you don't want and don't have security value."
"I think they probably need to, because a lot of companies are having this cloud-first strategy, where anything that's new has to go into the cloud for some reason."
"Technical support could use a little work in the terms of responding back. The feedback that we received is they do need a little more staff."
"Appliance-based setups can sometimes pose scalability issues"
"One thing we have mentioned to them before is that we'd like to be able to do searches, or drill-downs, directly from an alarm. When you click it and the Inspector tab slides out, that might be a good place to be able to click the host to search for the last 24 hours. I know the search is right there but it would be even nicer to just click that and then have an option to search something there."
"Scalability-wise, it's not that great."
"The software needs to work on its pricing."
"There is room for improvement with separate running sources or better integration."
"We have gone through a few versions which has caused a lot of instability. We have logged a lot of hours with professional services."
"Snare should modernize its GUI a little bit."
"Users will initially find it difficult to identify the event types and installation in Snare."
"The solution is now developing a SIEM-like feature on Snare Central Server, but it's not complete yet."
LogRhythm SIEM is ranked 8th in Log Management with 166 reviews while Snare is ranked 44th in Log Management with 3 reviews. LogRhythm SIEM is rated 8.4, while Snare is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of LogRhythm SIEM writes "The solution reduced our investigation time from days to hours and assists in managing our workflows". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Snare writes "A highly scalable solution that is easy to manage and super easy to set up". LogRhythm SIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm Axon and Microsoft Sentinel, whereas Snare is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, syslog-ng, SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server, ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) and Elastic Security. See our LogRhythm SIEM vs. Snare report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors and best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.