We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure File Storage and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The profile management option is another valuable feature that allows us to manage the profiles and secure them."
"The solution can scale to fit any requirement."
"The biggest advantage of Azure File Storage vis-à-vis other public cloud storage providers, and why we recommend Azure first and foremost, is that many of our customers have partnerships with Microsoft and so they have access to better cloud economics. Compared to AWS, we have found that (from a customer perspective) Azure is much more competitive."
"What I like about Microsoft Azure File Storage is its convenience for customers, cost-effectiveness, and high availability."
"It was quick to synchronize back from Azure to the on-premise server."
"It is very easy to use SSTP and some traditional code to move the data into a database because we can easily use the permissions and we don't have any integration or conversion issues."
"The solution is user-friendly and integrates easily with web apps."
"The initial setup is straightforward and takes approximately twenty minutes."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."
"The interface is good."
"The backup is reliable and intuitive."
"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."
"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."
"It's a scalable product."
"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."
"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."
"Microsoft Azure File Storage needs more integrations. In the future, I also want to see GRC added to the portal. If you enroll or sign up for Azure services, your country may not have GRC available in the portal, so you may have to choose a strange country, for example, Kenya, to activate credit."
"The product must provide better security functions."
"The solution is not user-friendly."
"The product name keeps changing. It can be confusing when product names change frequently, especially with Microsoft. Sometimes, if you refer to a product by a certain name last year, it might have a different name six months later."
"Some of the procedures are a bit more complex in Azure than in other providers."
"Azure File Storage's stability is okay, but sometimes we have trouble with the link to the Azure VPN disconnecting."
"If the file is large, there may be a delay in download time."
"Maybe Microsoft can make it more economical because it is a costly affair."
"We cannot use the product with other brands."
"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."
"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."
"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."
"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."
"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution."
"The solution needs to add an archive function."
More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 44 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 13th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews. Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8.2, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure File Storage writes "Various storage options available, high availability, and quick deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "A backup solution for data storage and restoration with point-in-time recover". Microsoft Azure File Storage is most compared with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Azure NetApp Files, Wasabi, Amazon S3 and Nutanix Unified Storage, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Wasabi and Amazon S3 Glacier. See our Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
