We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure and Oracle Java Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a cloud service, so it's always up to date."
"We have found the most valuable feature to be the pricing calculator."
"Provides a high level of availability and 99% uptime."
"Feedback and error messages make much more sense in Azure than in AWS."
"We've found the solution to be extremely flexible."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure is it has everything together in one place. It is one large tool with lots of small tools that are updated often."
"Being cloud-based saves the provisioning aspect of an on-premises solution."
"Being able to set up, change and configure VMs is easy - a lot easier than in AWS."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"Self-provisioning, easy to choose from WebLogic 11g to 12c."
"One key feature is getting to choose the Virtual Machine configurations while setting up the server, which is an automated process."
"The auto-backup, incremental backup and restoration features can be invaluable for management."
"Cloud has provided less maintenance."
"The framework supports auto-configuration. A lot of features are already there. It is reliable and user-friendly to develop code, back-end engineering, or locate specific information such as addresses."
"Backing up and recovery for my domain is very easy and fast. In addition, applying patches and undoing applied patches is effective and easy to do."
"The automated features of auto-purging in 12c helps clear disk space on a routine basis."
"The solution could be easier to use. However, when comparing it to AWS it is a bit easier."
"Lacks flexibility in terms of storage or resource allocation."
"When we are doing transfers of records in large amounts, for example, petabytes of data or few long datasets, the performance should not degrade as it does."
"Microsoft Azure is so complicated inside. If you should do something internally, if you have to configure something, the opinion about Azure is that it is a little complicated inside. That's why the end users and clients are looking for help and why we help them configure and do anything inside of Azure. That is why we offer other tools to optimize the Azure environment."
"Its costing can be improved. There should be better cost management."
"I'd like to see better integration with S/4HANA integrated and other services, like monitoring, for example."
"Virtual networks might be improved by adding more rules for the validation of protocols and peripheral elements in security assurance."
"I would say an improvement could be allowing for more external, third-party tools. However, I think that's their vision, how they develop the product."
"The product is satisfactory but we need more training on managing the machine itself. For example, how do we add more storage, how do we extend a specific portion? I would like to see videos illustrating some of the technical tasks that we often need to do."
"Needs better integration with other Oracle/non-Oracle products."
"There are issues with the application's development, including small glitches and errors."
"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in PaaS Clouds with 299 reviews while Oracle Java Cloud Service is ranked 19th in PaaS Clouds with 15 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while Oracle Java Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Java Cloud Service writes "User-friendly code development solution needing enhancements addressing glitches". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Oracle Java Cloud Service is most compared with Amazon AWS and Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service. See our Microsoft Azure vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.