We performed a comparison between Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Rapid7 InsightVM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is up-to-date and helps prevent zero-day attacks."
"One valuable feature is the Microsoft Security Scorecard."
"The product's stability is very high...The scalability of the product is amazing."
"The solution helps identify threats and vulnerabilities."
"The product’s most valuable features are compliance, recommendations, and inventories."
"There are many integrations with things like the VMware NSX that are great, the reporting is really solid."
"InsightVM offers a robust platform for identifying, prioritizing, and addressing vulnerabilities across an organization's IT infrastructure."
"When you connect any new device to the network, Rapid7 has the ability to detect the new device immediately. It can scan that device to detect if it has any vulnerability. It tells you what is vulnerable and what has been misconfigured. It also tells you what is the risk of that misconfiguration or lack of patches and how to resolve the problem."
"InsightVM's most valuable feature is risk scoring, a formula based on different vectors like the ease of exploitation and the availability of the machine."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"This solution is very easy to use and easy to install."
"The solution is good because it has a lot of options."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is its dashboards."
"The technical support takes too much time to resolve tickets."
"The general support could be improved."
"Integration can be improved."
"It is challenging to extract and customize reports from the system."
"The setup phase of the product is not that easy and needs a person to have a certain level of expertise."
"We have some issues with how it scans patches."
"InsightVM could be improved by providing passive scanning as an option."
"There are end-user needs and expectations that are being overlooked in the development that could be addressed by appointing a customer advisory board."
"They should integrate the solution with multiple products."
"We'd like the agent to cover more compliance issues."
"I would say that it improved our visibility, but it left things open."
"The reporting is very bad when you compare it with other vulnerability assessment tools."
"There should be containerization within the VM."
More Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is ranked 7th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 5 reviews while Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2, while Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management writes "The vulnerability assessment is very accurate because it runs directly into the vulnerability database". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management, Microsoft Sentinel and Microsoft Defender XDR, whereas Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Wiz and Rapid7 InsightIDR. See our Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Rapid7 InsightVM report.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.