We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra ID and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's pretty easy to implement."
"We use Verified ID to select and deselect users. During the pandemic, we had many users who left our organization or were no longer involved in certain projects but had their user credentials with them. To prevent data loss and data piracy, we deselected those remote users from Active Directory, and it was a very quick process."
"I like the downloads, availability for Android and iOS operating systems, and integration with Microsoft applications, such as Azure- and Office-based solutions. It is an excellent tool that helps with day-to-day business operations. I also like that I can install the app on my mobile."
"Microsoft Authenticator is highly secure."
"The ability to speed up ability is an asset."
"Conditional Access is a helpful feature because it allows us to provide better security for our users."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Entra ID are the login and the conditional access pieces."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to set up conditional access, where you can enforce users to connect using multifactor authentication."
"The solution is simple to use."
"The validation and integrity features of the endpoint are great."
"The interface is easy to use."
"I would rate it an eight out of ten. The price plays a factor in the rating."
"We previously used Microsoft's technical support, which was excellent; they were very responsive. Now, we use a CSP, and their support is lacking, so I rate them five out of ten."
"The solution could be improved when it comes to monitoring and logging as these are the most critical areas in case something was to go wrong."
"Sometimes, the notifications and alerts are not delivered properly, and we end up missing them. Also, the overall graphical user interface needs to be improved."
"Azure AD provides two types of features. One is Azure AD Excel and is already B2C. Out of both versions, Azure B2C requires some improvement, in terms of user management and role management, et cetera."
"The thing that is a bit annoying is the inability to nest groups. Because we run an Azure hybrid model, we have nested groups on-premise which does not translate well. So, we have written some scripts to kind of work around that. This is a feature request that we have put in previously to be able to use a group that is nested in Active Directory on-premise and have it handled the same way in Azure."
"To look at more documentation, engineering, or an open standard would be nice."
"I would like it to be easier to integrate third-party applications."
"Lacks the ability to integrate network monitoring solutions and authenticate the app users."
"There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure."
"SafeNet's reporting and monitoring features could be improved."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Entra ID is ranked 1st in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 190 reviews while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is ranked 21st in Single Sign-On (SSO). Microsoft Entra ID is rated 8.6, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID writes "Saves us time and money and features Conditional Access policies, SSPR, and MFA". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales SafeNet Trusted Access writes "Simple to use, easy to set up, and performs well". Microsoft Entra ID is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Google Cloud Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Ping Identity Platform and Okta Workforce Identity, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Auth0. See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors, and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.