We performed a comparison between Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC."Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance helps with extra collaboration and ensures communication is within the framework."
"The Advance Workflow feature simplifies things."
"RSA Archer's best features are advanced workflow, reports, dashboards, and notifications."
"It is a very friendly tool. We can easily understand what is going on inside the tool. I like this tool. We can work with the tool for the ERP platform. We can create automated applications based on the requirements."
"From my perspective, because I've always done it as a consultant, I do like the way it is configured. They've gone into changing the application builder interface, so it is even easier. When you're working with users, it is really easy to show them how to do things quickly and how to configure, change, and design stuff quickly."
"The most valuable feature is the enterprise module, which provides the capability of having all of the information stored and linked with everything else."
"RSA is a very rich application. I like its adaptive suggestion, where based on your users and the class of data, it can actually recommend you the proper control to choose. For example, we have been using PCI DSS as an NIST. So based on application feedback, it will provide you with a suggestion on which control objective needs to be set. Based on that, you can make a decision—you don't need to take the suggestion, but you can customize that particular provided suggestion. RSA Archer's workflow is also good, in terms of process automation."
"The last project was for an investment group that was using Excel. Shifting their records from one position to another took approximately 15 minutes. In Archer, we created a workflow for them to leverage it, and they could send the single record with one click to one person within seconds. The whole process went from 15 minutes to two minutes to get the approval for the records. The main purpose of Archer is to just make it easy."
"Good dashboards and reporting features; it's easy to gather reports quickly."
"The product should incorporate more automation with the help of AI."
"It would be nice if RSA Archer featured more customization. When customers are updating, they should be notified whether certain updates are optional. The install screen should not proceed to the next page unless we make some selections about which updates we want to install."
"GUI could be improved."
"The solution as a whole could be simplified."
"Its customization features could be better."
"If you need to integrate the RSA products with another SEIM solution, then it doesn't work properly."
"The technology's a little outdated."
"I would like to see real-time data, from vulnerabilities, and threats."
"The financial area of RSA Archer has room for improvement."
Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance is ranked 13th in GRC with 1 review while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews. Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance is rated 9.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance writes "Helps with extra collaboration and ensures communication is within the framework". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance is most compared with Proofpoint Email Protection, Barracuda Email Protection, Mine PrivacyOps and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Workiva Wdesk and Snow Governance & Risk.
See our list of best GRC vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.