We performed a comparison between Netskope Advanced Analytics and Splunk User Behavior Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)."It provides comprehensive reports, including predefined templates tailored for compliance requirements, making it easier to present detailed information to customers."
"The product is at the forefront of auto-remediation networking. It's great."
"We are really pleased with Splunk and its features. It would be practically impossible to function without it. To provide a general overview of the system, it's important to note that the standard log files are currently around 250 gigabytes per day. It would be impossible to manually walk through these logs by hand, which is why automation is essential."
"This intelligent user behavior analytics package is easy to configure and use while remaining feature filled."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to search through a large amount of data."
"The solution is fast, flexible, and easy to use."
"Because of some of the visualizations that we utilize, we are able to understand strange, unusual traffic on our networks."
"Splunk is more user-friendly than some competing solutions we tried."
"The solution is definitely scalable."
"Netskope could consider implementing a user-friendly interface with a 'pick and choose' option that allows users to select and configure components from existing templates, making the customization process more accessible."
"The solution is much more expensive than relative competitors like ArcSight or LogRhythm. It makes it hard to sell to customers sometimes."
"It would be good if the solution had an analytics tool that allowed us to analyze the data without writing specific queries."
"I'm not aware of any lacking features."
"We want to have an automated system for bot hunting that enables us to detect anomalies predictively based on historical data. It would be helpful if Splunk included process mining as an alternative option. We have a threat workflow, but it would be useful if we could supplement that with some process mining capabilities over time."
"The price of Splunk UBA is too high."
"The ability to do more complicated data investigation would be a welcome addition for pros, though the functionality now gives most people what they need."
"They should work to add more built-in correlation searches and more use cases based on worldwide customer experiences. They need more ready-made use cases."
"The correlation engine should have persistent and definable rules."
More Splunk User Behavior Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Netskope Advanced Analytics is ranked 20th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 1 review while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is ranked 2nd in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 18 reviews. Netskope Advanced Analytics is rated 7.0, while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Netskope Advanced Analytics writes "User-friendly experience and customization of workflow with certain scripting challenges". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk User Behavior Analytics writes "Easy to configure and easy to use solution that integrates with many applications and scripts ". Netskope Advanced Analytics is most compared with Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, whereas Splunk User Behavior Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Identity, IBM Security QRadar, Cynet and Exabeam Fusion SIEM.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.