We performed a comparison between One Identity Safeguard and WALLIX Bastion based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The customer service and technical support are very good."
"The solution transparently integrates into the infrastructure and users do not notice it. I would give this feature the highest rating."
"There are numerous valuable data protection features, including the content and information that offer us more scalable protection as needed."
"The system is easy to manage, as it is not a system that you will change everything all of a sudden. It evolves most of the time with customer requests."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"It is generally easy-to-use and install."
"The technical support is tremendous."
"In terms of the user experience, it is a pretty useful product. It works in a good way."
"Its video recording capabilities have definitely been key for us."
"The support is great. They offer 24/7 support, but the specific level of support depends on your subscription. There's a weekday-only option, and a 24/7 option that covers all days of the week. They also have offices in different regions, including West Africa, so people there can easily get support. There's no need to worry about getting assistance."
"WALLIX Bastion's most valuable feature is the Access Manager because you can use it and access the data center without any client VPN."
"We use WALLIX Bastion to provide access and to monitor sessions."
"The interface is very simple. It doesn't need any plug-ins, just browsers that are installed at the beginning."
"The solution's technical support team is helpful."
"I like that it's Linux-based, and you don't need to have separate implementations, extra database licenses, or enterprise licenses. I think because it's Linux-based, it's more seamless than Windows. I also like the access manager, which I think is a super tool. Everything is browser-based, and you don't need a VPN. So, that's a great thing."
"Something for One Identity to look at is having integration guidelines for how to logically group accounts."
"When we compare One Identity Safeguard with Cyberark, we know CyberArk has other tools or other features that are more complex and more useful for the customers. For example, I have one customer that wants to elevate the permission that is available in CyberArk."
"We currently have a problem with the Active Directory integrations on Windows. Some of our users need to be logged with Active Directory, but we are having communication issues between One Identity and Active Directory. It seems that Active Directory is not well-integrated."
"The deployment affects our privileged users because it takes a long time for them to request privileges, which impacts the SLA."
"The main thing that needs improvement is the slowness. Apart from that, the change password check-in feature also needs improvement because it is not working perfectly accurately."
"The multilanguage functionality does not support the Arabic language, even though this solution is deployed in an Arabic region."
"We would like to be able to generate certificate signing requests (CSRs) from the interface for certificates."
"The Transparent Mode could be somewhat easier to use."
"The password management needs improvement. Management of Access Manager should be improved as well."
"It would be better if I could manage multiple accounts in one place, like CyberArk. With WALLIX, you can only manage one account, and you are given a separate category. You have to click on each connection to do anything. For example, CyberArk might give three options for one connection if you want to have an interactive user-level experience. But with WALLIX, you have to click three times to get that access. Also, the biggest disadvantage of WALLIX is the reporting. I feel like it's very weak in reporting when compared to the other solutions. As a solution, they're good and stable. But they need to make their reports neater and better. Right now, we're going to the console and then pressing buttons every single time."
"The product doesn't have behavior analytics. They promised to develop this, but only for the cloud, not for on-premise versions."
"Based on my experience as a sales tech person, one area of improvement could be a more unified licensing model."
"WALLIX Bastion is GUI-driven, but it sometimes needs some management."
"For me, the main issue has to do with the system performance itself."
"The performance of WALLIX Bastion's password manager is very low."
"There could be more automation features for the solution."
One Identity Safeguard is ranked 4th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 39 reviews while WALLIX Bastion is ranked 9th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 8 reviews. One Identity Safeguard is rated 8.2, while WALLIX Bastion is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of One Identity Safeguard writes "Provides us with centralized storage of secrets and credentials, and visibility into the use of privileged access". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WALLIX Bastion writes "Used to provide access and to monitor sessions". One Identity Safeguard is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Delinea Secret Server, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access, Fudo PAM and ObserveIT, whereas WALLIX Bastion is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access, Fudo PAM, Delinea Secret Server and Teleport. See our One Identity Safeguard vs. WALLIX Bastion report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.