We performed a comparison between OpenText LoadRunner Professional and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."When designing a workload model offers a good range of possibilities for creating goal-oriented scenarios, which helps us understand and meet SLAs."
"My favorite feature in LoadRunner Professional is its ability to group scripts under separate IDs."
"It provides clients with an understanding of application and system performance."
"The capabilities and flexibility of the Controller, the ability to monitor the systems under test, and the comprehensive results Analysis which saves a great deal of time."
"I like the user interface. I like the way we can divide our scenarios and can tune them. The integration with the quality center is great. These features are really good."
"The front loader and the reporting features are the most valuable aspects of OpenText LoadRunner Professional."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"LoadRunner is a very sophisticated tool, and I can use many languages. For example, I can use Java. I can use C++. I can test the Internet of Things, FTP, mail, and Active Directory. It is very useful."
"User-friendly ID and direct integration with GitHub are the most valuable."
"Visual Studio is an exemplary integrated development environment that stands out due to its exceptional features. It allows for the seamless selection of the appropriate programming language for the specific development tasks at hand. This facilitates a swift and effortless transition between languages, providing a highly efficient development experience."
"It's great for the development of .NET."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"Visual Studio Test Pro is super helpful for my Microsoft app work."
"I was satisfied with the support given by customer service."
"It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability."
"Instead of having too many graphs and tabs, use the analysis section to get a more simplified defect analysis."
"There should be more integration with more open-source platforms."
"The technical support of Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional could improve. I had an issue with the licensing and their response time is slow. They can improve on this in the future."
"The debugging capability should be improved."
"I recently just got to see LoadRunner Developer, but it is still not fully developed to use."
"You should be able to use LoadRunner as a single platform. You should be able to have browser based access. You should be able to run enterprise tests."
"I guess scalability becomes a problem when you use things like TruClients."
"We still have some issues with integration with things like SiteScope which, obviously, being another HPE product should be very straightforward, but there are always issues around that."
"I would appreciate some enhancements in the interface, maybe adding more color options."
"The solution's deployment is not very easy and should be made easier."
"The price is reasonable, but it's not the best."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a little pricey."
"The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers."
"Enhancing the support for web application testing and load performance would be an improvement."
"The solution should be cheaper."
More OpenText LoadRunner Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText LoadRunner Professional is ranked 2nd in Performance Testing Tools with 77 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. OpenText LoadRunner Professional is rated 8.4, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText LoadRunner Professional writes "A sophisticated tool that supports many languages and works with all kinds of applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". OpenText LoadRunner Professional is most compared with Tricentis NeoLoad, OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, Apache JMeter and IBM Rational Performance Tester, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT Developer.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.