We performed a comparison between OpenVPN Access Server and Safe-T Secure Application Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"OpenVPN Access Server is a simple and easy-to-use solution that I can use myself without anybody's help."
"The solution is user-friendly and easy to implement."
"Provided the easiest UX for our end-users and had the greatest interoperability with all the operating systems we used, including but not limited to: iOS, Android, OS X, Windows, and Linux."
"I like that it's easy to use, easy to download, and not hard to manage."
"The initial setup phase of OpenVPN Access Server was fine, and it was easy."
"It was very easy to set up users."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"The best thing is that it is open source and free of cost."
"If you want a very flexible system that you can easily integrate, and develop interfaces for it or plug-ins to other application environments, it's probably the most flexible"
"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure."
"Safe-T is very good for users because it has plug-in for Outlook."
"It's easy to use over the web. A user who is not in the office can use it and securely insert files."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Needs a better GUI."
"I would like to see a simpler interface, so that we can make the connection between the local network using the LAN IP."
"Working on a faster connection might be a good idea for the product's next release."
"The server configuration file needs to be improved, it's the biggest problem in the configuration process."
"I would like to see a GUI or Web UI to manage users. Today these features are in the Pro Edition or are done by scripts."
"OpenVPN does not have the ability to selectively terminate connections."
"The upgrade path from older versions was more difficult than we wanted to tackle, so we ran an older version of the software for longer than I wanted. Patching, updating, and migrating to newer versions was a problem for us. That said, we were on a rather old version that I inherited yet it worked rock solid."
"I would like to see continued advanced security implementation."
"One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."
"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office."
Earn 20 points
OpenVPN Access Server is ranked 1st in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 45 reviews while Safe-T Secure Application Access is ranked 44th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. OpenVPN Access Server is rated 8.4, while Safe-T Secure Application Access is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenVPN Access Server writes "An easy-to-use tool with which its users can access networks from home or external locations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Safe-T Secure Application Access writes "The architecture is open to integration and development, making the product very flexible". OpenVPN Access Server is most compared with Fortinet FortiClient, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Check Point Remote Access VPN and SonicWall Netextender, whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access is most compared with . See our OpenVPN Access Server vs. Safe-T Secure Application Access report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.