We performed a comparison between Oracle Application Testing Suite and Tricentis NeoLoad based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Performance Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Oracle Application Testing Suite's most valuable feature is it works very smoothly with all Oracle Java-based applications."
"OpenScript has many features that make it useful, including the ability to record and playback."
"User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps."
"I like the functional testing. There's a product inside OATS called OLT, Oracle Load Testing. You can do the load testing without depending on any other tool"
"We like that we don't need a separate management tool. This is a good feature. It also has an inbuilt performance tool which is on Flash. It has very good record and playback feature as well. The inspection tool is also very good. Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."
"We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users."
"The function test feature is valuable."
"The solution is scalable."
"I like the solution’s performance and integration. Also, the tool’s help center is very responsive and helpful. They have always helped me within a short duration of time."
"The most effective aspect is especially when I'm renaming all the scripting factors, basically the containers that I use."
"NeoLoad is actually really good, mainly because they have a world-class support service."
"From a functional perspective, the range of tools provided with Tricentis NeoLoad is perhaps the widest."
"The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to."
"There are several key features, including Jenkins integration, infrastructure monitoring, and results analysis."
"In my opinion, correlation of dynamic data is the most important advantage of this tool."
"Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good."
"Licensing policies could be more intuitive."
"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."
"It needs to be compatible with all browsers."
"I have faced issues with some indexing items."
"I would like to see better dashboards."
"If there's a feature we want in OATS that's missing and we report that to Oracle, it takes a long time."
"Lacks patches for new OS systems and doesn't work on a Mac."
"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."
"An area for improvement in Tricentis NeoLoad is its integration with third-party tools because, at the moment, it's a bit complicated. Per Tricentis, you can integrate Tricentis NeoLoad with different monitoring tools such as Dynatrace and New Relic, but that requires installing an additional tool to make that integration happen, rather than being able to pull in Tricentis NeoLoad from the different tools and servers, and make integration simpler and easier."
"Connecting with the solution's technical support can be time-consuming. The turnaround time for a ticket raised is around 72 hours, which becomes an issue when working on a huge project in our company."
"Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing."
"We would like NeoLoad to be able to support more protocols. Testing can also be a little tricky at times."
"In future releases, it would be good if extra added features for integration are added into NeoLoad."
"Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols."
"The SAP area could be improved."
"The debugging part of Tricentis NeoLoad takes time."
More Oracle Application Testing Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Application Testing Suite is ranked 9th in Performance Testing Tools with 24 reviews while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 3rd in Performance Testing Tools with 62 reviews. Oracle Application Testing Suite is rated 7.8, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Application Testing Suite writes "Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes " Maintenance will be easy, pretty straightforward to learn and flexible". Oracle Application Testing Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One, Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud and Eggplant Test, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, Tricentis Tosca and IBM Rational Performance Tester. See our Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad report.
See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.