We performed a comparison between Oracle Service Bus and Red Hat Fuse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ability to master the process in one location."
"There are always continuous improvements that are happening."
"It was very good at supporting high transactions, up to 300 transactions per second."
"I like the ease of deployment and the ease of implementation."
"With Oracle Service Bus, we can connect with different types of systems. Another feature I like the most is the security feature."
"The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered."
"Service Bus is good at routing the transformation."
"Monitoring feature that allows tracking of the web's UI development."
"With a premium, one can get support 24 hours."
"The installation is quite okay. We don't really change much in the configuration. Most of the time, most of the settings remain with the default and we are able to handle our needs using the default setting."
"More than a feature, I would say that the reliability of the platform is the most valuable aspect."
"The most valuable feature is the software development environment."
"We use it because it is easy to integrate with any other application...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution nine out of ten."
"One of the features I found most valuable in Red Hat Fuse is that it has a lot of containers so you won't have to worry about load balancing. In the past, there was a cut-off, but nowadays, Red Hat Fuse is moving off of that, so my team is utilizing it the most for load balancing, particularly running goal applications and three to five containers. There's automatic load balancing so you won't have to worry too much. I also found that component-wise, you don't have to do much coding in Red Hat Fuse because everything is configurable, for example, XML-based coding. Coding isn't that difficult. Performance-wise, I also found the solution to be quite good and its processing is quite fast. My team is processing a huge amount of data with the help of Red Hat Fuse."
"I found it was quite easy to set up and implement."
"This solution's adaptability to our use case has helped us integrate our systems seamlessly."
"Security needs to be more integrated."
"The support for GraphQL needs to be improved, and the response time for global support could be faster."
"There is significant room for improvement in the monitoring capabilities."
"The interface console is very slow. Even in production, we need to increase the RAM or CPU. And even after that, the performance is still not good in production."
"The pricing of the product could be better. It's a bit high."
"The initial setup is likely complex for many organizations."
"It needs to support more adapters, because the integration points keep changing and new things keep coming up. It also needs to be more scalable."
"There are times when I select components in composite and they do not appear, and I cannot figure out why."
"In the next release, I'd like more stability and more security overall."
"For improvement, they can consider the way we collaborate with other applications...Right now, in Red Hat Fuse, everything is not available under one umbrella."
"Red Hat Fuse doesn't have a lot of administrative control like other applications."
"I would like to see more up-to-date documentation and examples from Red Hat Fuse."
"Red Hat is not easy to learn. You can learn it but you sometimes need external expertise to implement solutions."
"While it's a good platform, the pricing is a bit high."
"It might help if, in the documentation, there were a comments section or some kind of community input. I might read a page of documentation and not fully understand everything, or it might not quite answer the question I had. If there were a section associated with it where people could discuss the same topic, that might be helpful because somebody else might have already asked the question that I had."
"The stability of the solution is an area with a shortcoming that needs to be improved."
Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews while Red Hat Fuse is ranked 4th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 23 reviews. Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8, while Red Hat Fuse is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Configurable, doesn't require much coding, and has an automatic load balancing feature, but its development features need improvement". Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus, whereas Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, JBoss ESB and webMethods Integration Server. See our Oracle Service Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
