We performed a comparison between Oracle WebCenter and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server."
"Oracle integrates well with other products to cover Big Data."
"Integration within the solution is very good."
"The WebCenter Content is its most valuable feature. After we update a document in WebCenter Content, it can be update automatically in our intranet."
"A great solution for storing and searching large volumes of documents with easy access."
"WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly."
"It's a very scalable solution and the performance is pretty good. The scalability, in my opinion, is the biggest advantage."
"There is not just one valuable feature; it is all of them working together."
"Tech support tops off as excellent."
"We can arrange all our documents on one platform and see the document's changes and edits."
"It offers an easy way to store unstructured content (.pdf, .doc, .xls, images) and to tag them with metadata."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Combined reports and data with timeline tracking."
"It's stable. It's very widely used by companies. Also, the knowledge of the product has improved over the years, and by other companies that support it or are Microsoft SharePoint partners. So if there are problems, there's always a user or company that knows the information or can help you; even with very uncommon problems."
"It is very stable."
"The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product."
"WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system."
"There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market."
"Its functions need more stability."
"The speed of the backup should be enhanced."
"I would like them to add more Web 2.0 features."
"Does not seem to be totally compatible with Windows 10 as of our current version."
"This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language."
"I would like a simpler, more cost-effective solution for connecting data sources with workflows and BI tools, or data mining tools."
"It will fully use your system resources."
"The product does not perform 100% when used outside of a Microsoft based browser, Chrome, Firefox, etc."
"The management of the product/back-end is complex."
"Improve the user-friendliness."
"SharePoint designer workflows can be buggy sometimes without any apparent reason."
"The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"This solution would benefit from the implementation of enhanced online forms and template development capabilities."
Oracle WebCenter is ranked 15th in Enterprise Content Management with 12 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 150 reviews. Oracle WebCenter is rated 7.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Gives me easy access, connection and compatibility with all of the Oracle products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Oracle WebCenter is most compared with Oracle Content Management, Adobe Experience Manager, WebLogic Suite, Liferay Digital Experience Platform and IBM FileNet, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, WordPress and Box. See our Oracle WebCenter vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors, best Web Content Management vendors, and best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.