We performed a comparison between Picus Security and XM Cyber based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration capabilities with the other security tools."
"One of the most valuable features would be the detection capability, specifically the ability to detect alarms and logs collected from SIEM tools."
"It's very useful software because the customer mostly configures their IPS and manages their firewalls, WAF, and the DBS according to the latest update, latest news, or according to the situation."
"The most valuable feature of Picus Security is its threat intelligence, providing suggestions to block and prevent attacks by identifying malicious files and providing threat IDs."
"You have the liberty of physically executing a specific set of rules in your environment."
"What I personally like very much, from my experience, is that it is very reliable."
"The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation."
"According to the attack vectors, you cannot specify which product is failing or which product is working well because there's no agent."
"Let's say if a customer's environment has 10 security devices and they need to know that there is an attack that has bypassed their devices, they cannot go and inspect every device and every rule in their security devices."
"The reporting and data analysis could be improved. Specifically, the analysis of the results."
"To improve, Picus Security could consider establishing a data center in India to address trust issues and increase interest from Indian customers."
"The amount of integrations that the product can handle is an area of concern, making it one of the aspects where improvements are required."
"We'd like to see a cheaper price."
"XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas."
Picus Security is ranked 3rd in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 5 reviews while XM Cyber is ranked 6th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews. Picus Security is rated 9.0, while XM Cyber is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Picus Security writes "A tool with great integration capabilities and a good support team". On the other hand, the top reviewer of XM Cyber writes "Reliable with no false-positives and helpful support". Picus Security is most compared with Pentera, Cymulate, SafeBreach, AttackIQ and Tenable One Exposure Management Platform, whereas XM Cyber is most compared with Pentera, Cymulate, SafeBreach, Tenable Security Center and Qualys VMDR. See our Picus Security vs. XM Cyber report.
See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
