We performed a comparison between PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is straightforward."
"The product is easy to use."
"The most valuable features of PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition are the vast amount of options and ease of use. They frequently improve the solution every six months to a year. Additionally, if we want any more features we can upload a custom script to meet our needs."
"I like normal dynamic scanning, general web applications scanning, and vulnerability assessments."
"This tool helps identify vulnerabilities. We then provide the report to the developers, who address the issues identified automatically. Its most valuable feature is CI/CD integration."
"Parallel scans can be done with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition."
"We are in the early stage of using the solution making it difficult to fully determine the best features. However, we have noticed the CMDB and device discovery features look valuable at this time."
"The solution's extensions really expand the capabilities and features offered by the installation."
"The solution shows us classic categories, including high, medium, and low risks. It also shows critical items, and that gives us the advantage of prioritizing things."
"It is a simple solution that makes scanning easy. You just give it a scheduled task, and it will do everything for you."
"The initial setup was good. We didn't have any problems with it."
"It is quite easy to implement."
"This solution gives us insight into our environment and improves our security. It helps us to maintain a good patching system whereby we know that XYZ is vulnerable within the system."
"Qualys VM's best features are vulnerability management and customizable scoring."
"There are many features. Its reliability, ease of installation, ease of use, and the richness of the information provided are the most valuable features."
"Technical support is fantastic."
"It would be better if the solution is cloud-based."
"From my personal experience, the solution's performance could be improved."
"There's definitely room for improvement. There are lots of false positives. Once I do the manual assessment, it comes as a false positive. They need to improve the Enterprise Edition, especially the part that gives false positives."
"There are features or functionality missing, but PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition does try to update frequently to alleviate the shortcomings."
"The solution is a bit expensive."
"The cost per license per user could be cheaper, specifically for individual licensing."
"The implementation of the solution is quite complicated and could be easier."
"The stability of the scans could be improved."
"This solution could be improved by extending the agent capabilities to different operating systems including Mac and Linux. We would also like the capability to easily check for vulnerability in assets in the IOTs."
"Integration could be better. When you think about scanning, it's not used just with this product alone but with other Qualys products. If you think about the bundle, the product itself is good. But integration with other products and packages has space for improvement. They should also offer a better price for bundles."
"Qualys VM could improve by having more skilled support personnel."
"Qualys VM's scanner doesn't pick up every vulnerability, so we have to use multiple scanners to cover that gap."
"It's too early for me to say if there is any room for improvement since we're in the first couple of months of using this solution."
"They have integrated with other third parties, but it is still not viable."
"The only improvement I can think of is on the implementation side. At times it is a bit slow."
"Improve the user interface."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Pricing and Cost Advice →
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is ranked 4th in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) with 10 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is rated 8.0, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition writes " With a super easy initial setup phase, the tool also offers regular updates". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is most compared with Acunetix, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 Metasploit, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Amazon Inspector, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management. See our PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs. Qualys VMDR report.
We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
