Postman vs ReadyAPI Test comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Postman Logo
12,264 views|9,916 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
SmartBear Logo
2,426 views|1,986 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Oct 24, 2022

We performed a comparison between Postman and ReadyAPI based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: Users of both solutions say their deployment is straightforward.
  • Features: Users of both products are happy with their stability, scalability, flexibility, and automation features.

    Postman users like the solution’s ease of use, reporting, and user interface. Reviewers say the version management could be simplified and that its collection management could be improved, along with its email reporting function.

    ReadyAPI users say the solution can create stress tests very quickly, provides a customized environment, and is one of the best solutions you can get across the globe for API, test automation, and API penetration testing. Reviewers mention, however, that its UI could be better.
  • Pricing: Postman is open source. Users of ReadyAPI consider its pricing to be fair.
  • Service and Support: Postman users have only needed to use the community support forum and online resources. Users of ReadyAPI are very satisfied with the support they receive.
  • ROI: Postman users do not mention an ROI. Users of ReadyAPI report a positive ROI.

Comparison Results: Postman only has a couple of solutions to automate API tests, whereas ReadyAPI can do both API testing and load testing. ReadyAPI users also report a positive ROI, while Postman users do not. For these reasons, ReadyAPI wins this comparison.

To learn more, read our detailed Postman vs. ReadyAPI Test Report (Updated: March 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Postman lets you create, manage, and validate a suite of tests. It has several features to help you organize your test suite. You can also automate stuff with a lot of validations and assertions. Postman supports GraphQL, and you can do various kinds of calls.""The developers put the API in a common workspace which is a nice feature. It makes things much easier and faster to start testing.""In Postman, we have an option to directly import a call, make it a Postman collection, and execute it in a batch. This feature is very useful. It saves a lot of time. The manual effort is also reduced when we can just pick it in a Postman collection and then run and execute it to get the results.""The most valuable feature of Postman is the large libraries.""The scalability is good.""It is simple, easy to use and a good tool.""I like that it is very easy to use. I also like the automation feature.""The interface and the different types of API methods you can use are the most valuable aspects of this solution."

More Postman Pros →

"API mockups, functional testing, and load testing are valuable features.""The out-of-the-box support for the database is a valuable feature.""One good feature is SoapUI's URL check, which allows you to check among the applications. I'm not just talking about the ones for Android. It has all kinds of multi-world tests that are really helpful.""The solution has some good scanning features.""It's a very simple solution to use.""The solution scales well.""The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on.""The interface is user-friendly."

More ReadyAPI Test Pros →

Cons
"Postman needs more advanced data-driven testing.""I would like to see improvements in the maintenance of the scripts and their collections. It is really painful that the user cannot drag and drop. It was also painful to create the standard suite of operations for the product. I am not sure if this is improved in the tool’s latest versions. The maintenance of the complex scenarios prompted us to use the solution only for unit testing. In the future, we may switch to the k6 framework.""Multi-part requests should be handled in the octet-stream.""We have previously used Tosca which allowed us to verify information using authentications. It would be useful if this was also possible using Postman. In a future release, Postman should connect to DB.""Integration of the solution towards Bitbucket, BitHub, and CI pipelines is difficult.""To get this email reporting function, we have to integrate Postman with Newman. If the two are not integrated, we won't be getting all these things in one group.""They should integrate the solution with one of the CRM solutions.""Postman quality assurance could improve when doing tests."

More Postman Cons →

"SoapUI Pro is a little heavy due to the number of features. Previously it was not that heavy. Now the tool is too heavy, they should work on fixing this issue because until your system has lots of resources, you won't be able to use it seamlessly. The performance of the application itself could improve.""I find that I'm fighting with the opportunities to order requests.""Automation features are not user-friendly.""Stability has been an issue for us. It needs to be looked at and made a bit better.""The UI could be a bit more flexible.""If the load and bare minimum could be defined, I would give this solution a higher rating.""Could integrate the graphing module for load testing.""The UI should be improved."

More ReadyAPI Test Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is free."
  • "We are currently using the free version, but we have plans to buy a license."
  • "We are using the free version that is available."
  • "Its price is moderate as compared to other competitors. The version that we are using is not open source, so it is not free."
  • "The solution is open-source and free."
  • "I am using the free option."
  • "Postman is a free service."
  • "Unlike APIs, the solution does not require a license."
  • More Postman Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost is not that bad."
  • "I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."
  • "My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."
  • "The Pro version can be expensive for some companies. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees."
  • "We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."
  • "SoapUI Pro is open source but it has a subscription-based model which involves some more features. At the moment we are using the free version. The Pro version requires a license, and it is an annual license to use it."
  • "ReadyAPI Test is about $680 per user, per year."
  • "It is free of charge."
  • More ReadyAPI Test Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share them… more »
    Top Answer:The product is easy to implement.
    Top Answer:The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on.
    Top Answer:ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten.
    Top Answer:ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 17 in API Testing Tools
    Views
    12,264
    Comparisons
    9,916
    Reviews
    38
    Average Words per Review
    376
    Rating
    8.1
    8th
    out of 17 in API Testing Tools
    Views
    2,426
    Comparisons
    1,986
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Apache JMeter logo
    Compared 36% of the time.
    Tricentis Tosca logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Katalon Studio logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Apigee logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Parasoft SOAtest logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Also Known As
    SoapUI NG Pro
    Learn More
    Overview

    Postman's Tools Support Every Stage of the API Lifecycle. Through design, testing and full production, Postman is there for faster, easier API development - without the chaos.

    For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.
    Sample Customers
    PayPal, Shopify, Microsoft, Adobe, Atlassian, Twitter, BestBuy, Coursera
    Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Energy/Utilities Company14%
    Training & Coaching Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Logistics Company11%
    Outsourcing Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Insurance Company10%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Postman vs. ReadyAPI Test
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Postman vs. ReadyAPI Test and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Postman is ranked 1st in API Testing Tools with 52 reviews while ReadyAPI Test is ranked 8th in API Testing Tools with 31 reviews. Postman is rated 8.2, while ReadyAPI Test is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Postman writes "Reliable and easy to expand with a helpful API network". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ReadyAPI Test writes "You can achieve any complex task with this tool". Postman is most compared with Apache JMeter, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, Apigee and Parasoft SOAtest, whereas ReadyAPI Test is most compared with Broadcom Service Virtualization, ReadyAPI, Tricentis Tosca and Apigee. See our Postman vs. ReadyAPI Test report.

    See our list of best API Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.