We performed a comparison between Power Admin PA File Sight and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."The customers who have the use case of monitoring the file server and want to know the user's activity. It's the Power Admin's requirement."
"I like Splunk's data aggregation and search capabilities."
"It has helped us look at modern technology, as well as penetrate our legacy systems, to see where the bottlenecks are."
"It has a rapid response search environment in the event of an incident."
"Its huge, versatile AppBase helped me to configure and bring data from different sources to a unified platform."
"We can present to our management in real time the security of the batch management for the PCs, security regarding the network equipment. We're currently working in the Azure Cloud project, so we can send any logs from the cloud to Splunk. We can monitor them and we can present to the managers and customers. It's a very good solution for reporting. We use Splunk for reporting and monitoring of any solution in the company."
"It is easy to use in any environment."
"The SIEM is the most valuable feature of the product."
"Internal tracking is helpful because we do not like to deal with multiple ticketing systems, and I am not a fan of ServiceNow. We are able to keep everything internal and utilize Enterprise Security."
"The setup takes half an hour. It will be a little complex."
"I would like to see ability to master management. In terms of clustering, how it manages clustering needs improvement."
"It would be nice if Splunk reduced the cost of training. Their training sessions are way too costly."
"We will receive alerts only for the administrators and deployment servers, but not for all servers."
"The UI could be better. This is applicable to Splunk in general. I know that a lot of people who get their hands on Splunk are hesitant to use it just because they find it overwhelming. There are a lot of options."
"Better directions on search head clusters."
"I find the graphical options really limited and you don't have enough control over how to display the data that you want to see."
"Missing capability for audio/video and image processing."
"The CIM model is the method Splunk uses to normalize data and categorize its important parts, but it is quite complex."
Power Admin PA File Sight is ranked 39th in Log Management with 1 review while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Log Management with 240 reviews. Power Admin PA File Sight is rated 9.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Power Admin PA File Sight writes "Good stability and preferred choice for DLP needs over other solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Power Admin PA File Sight is most compared with , whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.