We performed a comparison between Qualys VMDR and Tenable.io Container Security based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Qualys VMDR is praised for its user-friendly interface, prioritization system, and customizable dashboard. It effectively addresses vulnerabilities and offers valuable scanning capabilities. Tenable.io Container Security excels at analyzing vulnerabilities and identifying misconfiguration. Reviewers said Qualys VMDR could improve by offering more customization options and integrating more seamlessly with other systems. The interface could be clearer, and Qualys could enhance scanning capabilities for IoT and industrial control systems. Tenable.io could improve by automating remediation and CIS benchmarks while enhancing asset visibility and implementing customizable compliance options.
Service and Support: Qualys VMDR's customer service is mostly considered accessible and responsive. However, some reviewers reported slow response times and expressed a desire for more skilled support personnel. Some users encountered technical issues when contacting Tenable.io support.
Ease of Deployment: The Qualys VMDR setup is considered uncomplicated and efficient, requiring only a short amount of time. A few users encountered challenges with integration and ensuring data privacy. Tenable.io Container Security comes with clear setup documentation, making the deployment process smooth.
Pricing: The cost of Qualys VMDR varies depending on the organization's business requirements. Some find it affordable, but others consider it costly compared to alternatives. Tenable.io Container Security's setup cost is determined by the application's page count.
ROI: Qualys VMDR offers users a solid ROI by efficiently identifying vulnerabilities and effectively reducing risks. Tenable.io Container Security users have provided no feedback on ROI so far.
Comparison Results: Qualys VMDR is preferred over Tenable.io Container Security. Users appreciate Qualys VMDR for its simple setup, user-friendly interface, and extensive vulnerability overview. They also liked useful features like continuous monitoring and asset tagging. Tenable.io Container Security falls short in terms of technical support response times and automation features.
"The solution is a good alerting tool."
"PingSafe has a dashboard that can detect the criticality of a particular problem, whether it falls under critical, medium, or low vulnerability."
"We use the infrastructure as code scanning, which is good."
"The user interface is well-designed and easy to navigate."
"The ease of use of the platform is very nice."
"PingSafe's most valuable feature is its unified console."
"The multi-cloud support is valuable. They are expanding to different clouds. It is not restricted to only AWS. It allows us to have different clouds on one platform."
"The cloud misconfiguration is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is the connection of threat intelligence information with identified vulnerabilities, which means you can prioritize vulnerabilities according to actual attacks."
"It is very easy to use and there are lots of options. We can usually easily go through it and all of the things we want to configure, and we can configure everything to our specifications very easily."
"The most valuable features are vulnerability scanning, policy compliance scanning, and tablet for web application scanning."
"It is a stable solution."
"Provides great functionality."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The prioritization feature is great. I think it has all of the advanced features that we need."
"The most valuable feature is that this solution is very lightweight."
"The tool's most valuable feature is scanning, reporting, and troubleshooting."
"It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, it is a good solution."
"Nessus scanner is very effective for internal penetration testing."
"Tenable.io detects misconfiguration when you deploy a Docker or Kubernetes container. It's much better to remedy these issues during deployment instead of waiting until the container is already in the production environment."
"The strong security provided by the product in the container environment is its most valuable feature."
"Currently, I haven't implemented the solution due to its deprecation by the site. However, I can highlight some benefits of Tenable Cloud Security, a cybersecurity solution with various features for scanning vulnerabilities in both cloud environments and on-premises container security."
"It helps us secure our applications from the build phase and identify the weaknesses from scratch."
"Sometimes the Storyline ID is a bit wacky."
"here is a bit of a learning curve. However, you only need two to three days to identify options and get accustomed."
"Bugs need to be disclosed quickly."
"There should be more documentation about the product."
"Cloud Native Security's reporting could be better. We are unable to see which images are impacted. Several thousand images have been deployed, so if we can see some application-specific information in the dashboard, we can directly send that report to the team that owns the application. We'd also like the option to download the report from the portal instead of waiting for the report to be sent to our email."
"There is room for improvement in the current active licensing model for PingSafe."
"Whenever I view the processes and the process aspect, it takes a long time to load."
"The main area for improvement I want to see is for the platform to become less resource-intensive. Right now, it can slow down processes on the machine, and it would be a massive improvement if it were more lightweight than it currently is."
"There needs to be better documentation."
"Qualys could be improved in its overall performance compared to other vulnerability management or scanning tools."
"The solution is a bit expensive if you do not have access to discounts."
"Sometimes the scanning can get overwhelmed and start to drag when a lot of users are trying to scan at once."
"Reports were lacking somewhat on the customization side."
"Qualys could improve the inbuilt dashboards."
"One of the biggest issues from the clients' perspective is that all Qualys computing is on the cloud."
"Qualys does have an on-prem solution, but it is very expensive."
"They need to work on auto-remediation so it's easier for the security team to act quickly when certain assets or resources are deployed. The latest version has a CIS benchmark that you need to meet for containers in the cloud, but more automation is needed."
"Tenable.io Container Security should improve integration modules. It should also improve stability."
"I believe integration plays a crucial role for Tenable, particularly in terms of connecting with other products and various container solutions like Docker or Kubernetes. It seems that in future updates, enhanced integration is something I would appreciate. Currently, there is integration with Docker, but when it comes to Kubernetes or other container solutions, it appears to be a challenge, especially with on-prem scanners."
"The initial setup is highly complex."
"The stability and setup phase of the product are areas with shortcomings where improvements are needed."
"I feel that in certain areas this product has false positives which the company should work on. They should also try to include business logic vulnerabilities in the scanner testing. Finally, the vulnerability assessment feature should be increased to other hardware devices, apart from firewalls."
"The support is tricky to reach, so we would like better-oriented technical support enabled."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Tenable.io Container Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Qualys VMDR is ranked 11th in Container Security with 77 reviews while Tenable.io Container Security is ranked 21st in Container Security with 7 reviews. Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2, while Tenable.io Container Security is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable.io Container Security writes "It helps you catch misconfigurations before they go into a production environment where they're harder to deal with". Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management, whereas Tenable.io Container Security is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Wiz and Trivy. See our Qualys VMDR vs. Tenable.io Container Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.