We performed a comparison between Quest InTrust and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."I would rate the technical support very well as they are knowledgeable and quick to respond."
"I really like the user interface and how it works."
"The most valuable feature of Splunk Enterprise Security is the comprehensive logging capabilities it provides."
"The solution allows easy gathering and ingestion of the data."
"The product provides visibility and enables us to correlate data and generate alerts."
"It's better than IBM, in my opinion, because it's an independent entity."
"The product has a good security posture."
"We were able to create a catalog of dashboards and have a holistic view at all levels. We could understand our business much better. Real-time errors, which were buried in emails before now, surfaced up on dashboards."
"It gives us good visibility into multiple environments, including cloud, on-premises, and hybrid; irrespective of platform."
"It needs to have better reporting. "
"It was very complex. There was poor native correlation. "
"The only improvement I am expecting is the cost of the licensing. Clients are going to other solutions just because of the cost."
"The UI could be better. This is applicable to Splunk in general. I know that a lot of people who get their hands on Splunk are hesitant to use it just because they find it overwhelming. There are a lot of options."
"It would be great if I could have a certain dialogue box in Splunk that uses innovative AI tools like ChatGPT, which are available now in the tech department."
"Splunk Enterprise Security can provide more details and help CISOs resolve vulnerability situations better. The reason is that the tools we choose for data analysis and log collection cannot collect all the data and logs. Splunk Enterprise Security should help me with this, but it cannot."
"This is a costly solution."
"AngularJS/ReactJS inclusion could be made easier in GUI."
"Its interface and usability can always be improved."
"Splunk is very expensive. The license is based on the volume of the logs ingested. I was responsible for managing the contract with our service integrator. I don't know the precise details of the competing solution, but I have heard that Splunk is more expensive than others. I don't know what the going rate is on the market, but I think there are at least two competitors that are less expensive. We have experienced a few issues with our service providers in terms of log filtering and ingestion, so we continue to pay a bit more per day for our logs."
Earn 20 points
Quest InTrust is ranked 57th in Log Management while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Log Management with 240 reviews. Quest InTrust is rated 8.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Quest InTrust writes "Technical support is knowledgeable and quick to respond". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Quest InTrust is most compared with Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and syslog-ng, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
